PaddleWise by thread

From: Chuck Holst <CHUCK_at_multitech.com>
subject: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 1998 09:21:19 -0600
>>
I would say that if you don't emphasize teaching the roll, then your
course has completely missed the boat!! (so to speak :)  What good
Greenland kayaker cannot roll?? And rolling with a proper Greenland   paddle
is so easy! Your course sounds too good to settle for mediocrity in this
way.
>>

Not to differ with Kevin, whose point I agree with, but merely as an
historical anecdote: F. Spencer Chapman, in one of his books about the
British Arctic Air Route Expeditions in East Greenland, said that only
about a quarter of the Inuit in the Angmagssalik district were good at
rolling, and many, if not most, could not roll at all! Chapman several
times comments on the fatalism of the natives, whom he admired and
apparently got along well with, which might have contributed to a lack
of interest in learning to roll.

I think the ACA Coastal Kayak Instructors Manual emphasizes the
importance of learning to roll, though it does not include it in the
two-day Introduction to Coastal Kayaking course because of lack of time.

As Nigel Foster pointed out in Sea Kayaker some time ago, a roll is
considered a basic skill in whitewater, so why not in sea kayaking?

Chuck Holst

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: R. Walker <rww_at_neosoft.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 1998 10:48:45 -0600
> As Nigel Foster pointed out in Sea Kayaker some time ago, a roll is
> considered a basic skill in whitewater, so why not in sea kayaking?

Because sea kayaks are a pain in the butt to put in a pool with 10 
other whitewater kayaks and canoes.  I did it and learned the skill 
but it certainly wasn't an easy fit or comfortable session...





Richard Walker
Houston, TX
http://www.neosoft.com/~rww/kayak_log.html
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Patrick Maun <pmaun_at_bitstream.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 1998 14:13:07 -0600
>Because sea kayaks are a pain in the butt to put in a pool with 10
>other whitewater kayaks and canoes.  I did it and learned the skill
>but it certainly wasn't an easy fit or comfortable session...

We must be lucky here. We had our second pool session of the season last
Monday and there were I believe only one or two whitewater boats (and one
of them manned by a sea kayaker). I have always had great fun at the pool
sessions here.  And hey, there are always several other Paddlewise folks
there!

Last year, a group of us from TCSKA rented an olympic-sized pool for three
hours. That pool was actually large enough that one could practice some
strokes.

-Patrick

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Patrick Maun
pmaun_at_bitstream.net


***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Product Information Department <pid_at_mec.ca>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 1998 12:15:47 -0800
At 09:21 AM 12/9/98 -0600, Chuck wrote:
>As Nigel Foster pointed out in Sea Kayaker some time ago, a roll is
>considered a basic skill in whitewater, so why not in sea kayaking?
>
Ah, the great roll debate. Are you a "real" kayaker if you can't roll? I'm
sure this has been batted around before, but before I came "onboard"
Paddlewise, so since fools rush in, my two cents (Canadian, so about
.0000005 cents American)…

To put my thoughts in context:
1. I can roll. Formerly damn near bombproofly, though somewhat less
reliably now as result of some spinal column problems. I have done a little
whitewater paddling, and a lot of surf kayaking.
2. I have never been a paid professional guide, but have taught people to
roll in pools and open water, and have taken individuals, some with no
experience, on trips of varying difficulty. This is in a friend and/or
Significant Other context, not as a club trip leader.

I can see why rolling is a basic skill in whitewater. Without it you're
going to spend a lot of time swimming, and not having much fun. Because
sea-kayaking is done to a variety of different extremes, I think the
situation is different here. It's quite possible, if you choose to, to
paddle your entire sea-kayaking career without ever needing a roll.

My inclination is to teach rescues like the stirrup rescue, or paddle float
self-rescue first. This is because I believe that beginners would have the
greatest chance of success with these, and that these rescues can in fact
be performed in the sort of relatively mild conditions that beginners would
and should be out in. Of course, the paddlers must be dressed for immersion
in the local water. 

I would then teach bracing and rolling in parallel, for two reasons. A
reliable roll gives paddlers the confidence to truly commit to a brace, as
opposed just sitting up right and making token slaps at the water with
their paddle. Bracing and rolling are also overlapping skills in that a
sweep for a roll is essentially a dynamic brace, just done from underneath.
 I would emphasise that bracing is preferable to rolling, and that not
being unintentionally in a situation where you need to brace is even more
preferable. (In a true crisis, one thing is better than presence of
mind—absence of body!)   

Can you be a "real" sea kayaker if you can't roll? Sure - I know a lot of
very skilled types, some of whom, for physical reasons, cannot roll. They
compensate by being very skilled bracers, and/or by exercising very good
judgement about weather and water conditions. I suspect they are safer in
their own way than kayakers whose ability to roll leads them to adopt an
overly gung-ho attitude and charge blindly into danger.

Perhaps the requirements for certification levels should be more "results
orientated". Rather than having to demonstrate a roll, for example, you
would need to demonstrate that you can cope with and/or land through
particular surf conditions. If you do that by effective bracing, I think
that in many ways that is preferable to doing it by rolling. ("To be able
to roll is a sign of success—to need to roll is a sign of failure.") 

Cheers,

Philip T.


****************************************
Mountain Equipment Co-op
1655 West 3rd Avenue,
Vancouver, BC, Canada V6J 1K1
Tel: 640-732-1989
Fax: 604-731-6483
email: pid_at_mec.ca

Visit our website at: http://www.mec.ca
*****************************************
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Richard Culpeper <culpeper_at_geocities.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 1998 16:50:15 -0500
Philip wrote:
--snip--
I would then teach bracing and rolling in parallel, for two reasons. A
reliable roll gives paddlers the confidence to truly commit to a brace, as
opposed just sitting up right and making token slaps at the water with
their paddle. Bracing and rolling are also overlapping skills in that a
sweep for a roll is essentially a dynamic brace, just done from underneath.
 I would emphasise that bracing is preferable to rolling, and that not
being unintentionally in a situation where you need to brace is even more
preferable. (In a true crisis, one thing is better than presence of
mind—absence of body!)   
--snip--

Wise words.  The annoying thing that I regularly come across when teaching
kayaking is that my students usually want to learn to roll immediately,
rather than put in the time required to learn to brace properly.  Between
sessions those who work on their rolls often end up with shoddy rolls and
shoddy braces.  Those who work on their braces often end up with good
braces and good rolls.  I would like to see instructors de-emphasize
rolling and stressing bracing for novice/intermediate students -- not that
I disagree with rolls (I believe that they are essential), but that I find
more important skills such as bracing being subsumed by the focus on
rolling.

Richard Culpeper
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Patrick Maun <pmaun_at_bitstream.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 1998 23:46:12 -0600
>Wise words.  The annoying thing that I regularly come across when teaching
>kayaking is that my students usually want to learn to roll immediately,
>rather than put in the time required to learn to brace properly.  Between
>sessions those who work on their rolls often end up with shoddy rolls and
>shoddy braces.

I think this works well in theory, but I'd have to agree with Chuck that
learning a roll really adds confidence to a brace. A lot of bracing that
people without a roll do is token slapping -- I know from personal
experience. When I was first starting out I was always nervous about really
committing to a brace, especially a high sculling brace. I think that by
learning a sweep roll you are really forced to learn good sculling
technique as well as develop a good hip-snap.

Besides, with winter (almost) here there are plenty of opportunities to use
beginners in the pool to practise these theories on! ;-)

-Patrick

PS I just spent the last four hours planning my Greenland paddle. It is
actually starting to resemble a paddle and not a 2x4!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Patrick Maun
pmaun_at_bitstream.net


***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: <Tomckayak_at_aol.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 10:53:59 EST
In a message dated 12/10/98 1:13:51 AM EST, pmaun_at_bitstream.net writes:

<< A lot of bracing that
 people without a roll do is token slapping -- I know from personal
 experience.  >>
Find a flat sandy ocean beach with small surf 2 to 3 feet surf. Go with
someone with experience. This is one of the few places a Sea kayaker can learn
to lean and bracing in a Sea kayak. Wear a helmit.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: John Winters <735769_at_ican.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 1998 07:53:44 -0500
Chuck wrote;
(SNIP)
>
>As Nigel Foster pointed out in Sea Kayaker some time ago, a roll is
>considered a basic skill in whitewater, so why not in sea kayaking?

HMMMM. Now, if a roll is a basic skill in kayaking then what about
canoeing?

Cheers,
John Winters
Redwing Designs
Specialists in Human Powered Watercraft
http://home.ican.net/~735769/

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Lloyd Bowles <lbowles_at_bmts.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 20:37:51 -0500
John Winters wrote:
> 
> Chuck wrote;
> (SNIP)
> >
> >As Nigel Foster pointed out in Sea Kayaker some time ago, a roll is
> >considered a basic skill in whitewater, so why not in sea kayaking?
> 
> HMMMM. Now, if a roll is a basic skill in kayaking then what about
> canoeing?

We canoeists just need to add a weighted keel to the canoe & strap
ourselves in. That would make our boats self-righting just like most
larger sailboats.
Oh, I forgot. We also need a good sprayskirt or plenty of floatation to
counter the weight of the keel. Otherwise the roll will be completed on
the way to the bottom. I seem to recall that happening to the "Vasa" &
to Henry VIII's big canoe, the "Mary Rose".
-- 
Lloyd Bowles
The Mad Canoeist
"Keep the open side up!"
http://www.fortunecity.com/greenfield/clearstreets/358/index.html
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Hank Hays <lhays_at_canby.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 17:08:57 -0800
>Chuck wrote;
>(SNIP)
>>
>>As Nigel Foster pointed out in Sea Kayaker some time ago, a roll is
>>considered a basic skill in whitewater, so why not in sea kayaking?

John Winters responded:
>HMMMM. Now, if a roll is a basic skill in kayaking then what about
>canoeing?

I consider it pretty basic in canoeing too.  I paddled decked C-1 for about
15 years, though.  I've rolled 17' Grummans... admittedly with a bit of
effort.  I should also admit that shoulder problems preclude my rolling any
more.  Rich K probably still does, but he's a young'n  <grin>.

Hank Hays



***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: <Johnlebl_at_aol.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 21:45:51 EST
In a message dated 12/10/1998 9:08:12 PM EST, lhays_at_canby.com writes:

<< I consider it pretty basic in canoeing too.  I paddled decked C-1 for about
 15 years, though.  I've rolled 17' Grummans... admittedly with a bit of
 effort.  I should also admit that shoulder problems preclude my rolling any
 more.  Rich K probably still does, but he's a young'n  <grin>.
 
 Hank Hays >>

In my younger years before there were a proliferation of kayaks, I too rolled
Grummans to see what it was like to roll a kayak.  Maybe that is why I still
own canoes adn not kayaks.  P S  I don't roll canoes anymore either!

John LeBlanc

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: John Winters <735769_at_ican.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 06:28:56 -0500
Hank wrote;
>I consider it pretty basic in canoeing too.  I paddled decked C-1 for
about
>15 years, though.  I've rolled 17' Grummans... admittedly with a bit of
>effort.  I should also admit that shoulder problems preclude my rolling
any
>more.  Rich K probably still does, but he's a young'n  <grin>.


Basic?

Is a C-1 a canoe? No forget I asked that.

Did you roll your Grumman fully loaded for a trip?

Basic?

Does any ACA course teach rolling canoes for wilderness tripping?

Cheers,
John Winters
Redwing Designs
Specialists in Human Powered Watercraft
http://home.ican.net/~735769/

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Mark Zen <canoeist_at_netbox.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1998 17:14:27 -0700
>>as Nigel Foster pointed out in Sea Kayaker some time ago, a roll is
>>considered a basic skill in whitewater, so why not in sea kayaking?
>
>HMMMM. Now, if a roll is a basic skill in kayaking then what about
>canoeing?

rolling is an advanced skill... under 10% can roll in a pool, less than 
5% under combat conditions, at least that's my observation of a 250-300+
member club.

mark

#------canoeist[at]netbox[dot]com--------------------------------------
mark zen                      o,    o__              o_/|   o_.
po box 474                   </     [\/              [\_|   [\_\
ft. lupton, co 80621-0474 (`-/-------/----')      (`----|-------\-')
#~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~_at_~~~~~~~_at_~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~_at_~~~~~~~~_at_~~~~~
http://www.diac.com/~zen/paddler  [index of Paddling websites I manage]
Rocky Mtn Sea Kayak Club, Colorado River Flows, Poudre Paddlers
The Colorado Paddlers' Resource, Rocky Mtn Canoe Club Trip Page 
#-Fortune:
"In a world without fences, who needs 'Gates'"
        -- Scott McNealy, CEO Sun Microsystems

"In a world without walls, who needs 'Windows'"
        -- Dave Livigni

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Mattson, Timothy G <timothy.g.mattson_at_intel.com>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 07:32:14 -0800
Mark,

I think you missed the point of the Nigel Foster quote.  Your club (at least
judging from your signature banner) is a sea kayak club.  We all know that
sea kayakers --- for a variety of reasons -- avoid learning to roll.  White
water kayakers, on the other hand, are obsessed with rolling.  80% of the
white water kayakers I know have solid river-rolls and the other 20% are
working very hard to get theirs.

Clearly, only very serious sea kayakers learn to roll -- and these people
tend to become (or already are) advanced paddlers.  This makes sea kayak
rolling by construction an advanced technique.  But it doesn't have to be
that way -- which is the point of the Nigel Foster quote.  Its not an
advanced technique in white water paddling.  Given that rolling a sea kayak
is no harder than rolling a white water boat (except when the  sea kayak
fits too loosely in which case they can be a bit harder to roll), there is
no reason rolling can't be a basic skill in sea kayaking as well.

The benefits of rolling a sea kayak are almost as great as in a white water
boat.  Its fun to stray into an intense tide rip or pounding surf and being
able to relax 'cause you can fall back on your roll.  It greatly expands the
range of conditions you can safely enjoy.  I qualify my opening sentence
with the word "almost", however, since some portion of the sea kayaking
population chooses to always paddle in calm water and as long as they take
steps to stick to that decision, they may not NEED to know how to roll
(though even they would benefit from the obvious saftey benefits of having a
roll).


--Tim

P.S. Anticipating a response from the gentleman from New York concerning
folding boats, there are boats that are hard to roll by design hence, it is
therefore possible that for these isolated cases, it is not productive to
push acquisition of rolling skills. 



> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Mark Zen [SMTP:canoeist_at_netbox.com]
> Sent:	Tuesday, December 15, 1998 4:14 PM
> To:	paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
> Subject:	Re: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan
> 
> >>as Nigel Foster pointed out in Sea Kayaker some time ago, a roll is
> >>considered a basic skill in whitewater, so why not in sea kayaking?
> >
> >HMMMM. Now, if a roll is a basic skill in kayaking then what about
> >canoeing?
> 
> rolling is an advanced skill... under 10% can roll in a pool, less than 
> 5% under combat conditions, at least that's my observation of a 250-300+
> member club.
> 
> mark
> 
> #------canoeist[at]netbox[dot]com--------------------------------------
> mark zen                      o,    o__              o_/|   o_.
> po box 474                   </     [\/              [\_|   [\_\
> ft. lupton, co 80621-0474 (`-/-------/----')      (`----|-------\-')
> #~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~_at_~~~~~~~_at_~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~_at_~~~~~~~~_at_~~~~~
> http://www.diac.com/~zen/paddler  [index of Paddling websites I manage]
> Rocky Mtn Sea Kayak Club, Colorado River Flows, Poudre Paddlers
> The Colorado Paddlers' Resource, Rocky Mtn Canoe Club Trip Page 
> #-Fortune:
> "In a world without fences, who needs 'Gates'"
>         -- Scott McNealy, CEO Sun Microsystems
> 
> "In a world without walls, who needs 'Windows'"
>         -- Dave Livigni
> 
> **************************************************************************
> *
> PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
> Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
> Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
> Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
> **************************************************************************
> *
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Steve Cramer <cramer_at_coe.uga.edu>
subject: [Paddlewise] Rolls (was ACA meetings: Greenland)
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 11:50:43 -0500
Mattson, Timothy G wrote:
> 
> Clearly, only very serious sea kayakers learn to roll -- and these people
> tend to become (or already are) advanced paddlers.  This makes sea kayak
> rolling by construction an advanced technique.  But it doesn't have to be
> that way -- which is the point of the Nigel Foster quote.  Its not an
> advanced technique in white water paddling.  

Only very serious sea kayakers _who intend to put themselves in bumpy
water_ (open ocean, surf, tidal rips) learn to roll, and not all of
them. This represents a minority of sea kayakers, many of whom don't
want to see any more than a 2" riffle.

_All_ ww kayakers intend to put themselves in bumpy water; that's the
point of the sport, so a roll is basic to ww. Also, a swim in a river
rapid exposes you to hazards (rocks, undercuts, strainers, keeper holes)
that a swim in the ocean generally doesn't.

> Given that rolling a sea kayak
> is no harder than rolling a white water boat (except when the  sea kayak
> fits too loosely in which case they can be a bit harder to roll), there is
> no reason rolling can't be a basic skill in sea kayaking as well.
> 

None, except that most sea kayakers don't feel they need to roll, and
they're probably right, considering the conditions the intend to paddle
in. BTW, I know a number of WW kayakers with decent Class III combat
rolls who were not able to roll even a well-fitting sea kayak at first,
including me. I would disagree that a sea kayak is as easy to roll as a
ww boat.

Steve
-- 
Test Scoring & Reporting Services       Sometimes, you never can
University of Georgia                     always tell what you
Athens, GA 30602-5593                       least expect the most.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Dan Volker <dlv_at_gate.net>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Rolls (was ACA meetings: Greenland)
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 14:18:15 -0500
If a person wants to sea kayak, but does not want to learn how to roll, then
maybe they should by a sit on top boat, like a surf ski. The 19 to 24 foot
long surfski are every bit as fast, if not faster than any sea kayak, and
can be rigged with hatches for storing gear, just like a sea kayak.
Dan Volker

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
[mailto:owner-paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net]On Behalf Of Steve Cramer
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 1998 11:51 AM
To: Paddlewise
Subject: [Paddlewise] Rolls (was ACA meetings: Greenland)


Mattson, Timothy G wrote:
>
> Clearly, only very serious sea kayakers learn to roll -- and these people
> tend to become (or already are) advanced paddlers.  This makes sea kayak
> rolling by construction an advanced technique.  But it doesn't have to be
> that way -- which is the point of the Nigel Foster quote.  Its not an
> advanced technique in white water paddling.

Only very serious sea kayakers _who intend to put themselves in bumpy
water_ (open ocean, surf, tidal rips) learn to roll, and not all of
them. This represents a minority of sea kayakers, many of whom don't
want to see any more than a 2" riffle.

_All_ ww kayakers intend to put themselves in bumpy water; that's the
point of the sport, so a roll is basic to ww. Also, a swim in a river
rapid exposes you to hazards (rocks, undercuts, strainers, keeper holes)
that a swim in the ocean generally doesn't.

> Given that rolling a sea kayak
> is no harder than rolling a white water boat (except when the  sea kayak
> fits too loosely in which case they can be a bit harder to roll), there is
> no reason rolling can't be a basic skill in sea kayaking as well.
>

None, except that most sea kayakers don't feel they need to roll, and
they're probably right, considering the conditions the intend to paddle
in. BTW, I know a number of WW kayakers with decent Class III combat
rolls who were not able to roll even a well-fitting sea kayak at first,
including me. I would disagree that a sea kayak is as easy to roll as a
ww boat.

Steve
--
Test Scoring & Reporting Services       Sometimes, you never can
University of Georgia                     always tell what you
Athens, GA 30602-5593                       least expect the most.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: K. Whilden <kwhilden_at_u.washington.edu>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Rolls (was ACA meetings: Greenland)
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 12:30:12 -0800 (PST)
Well, I guess it's time for my two pennies... Fortunately many of my
feelings have already been discussed, so I get to write less. :)

	 ___________________                                                            
	/   Kevin Whilden   \
       |Dept. of Geosciences \___
       |University of Washington \
       |kwhilden_at_u.washington.edu| 
        \________________________/                       

On Wed, 16 Dec 1998, Steve Cramer wrote:

> Mattson, Timothy G wrote:
> > 
> > Clearly, only very serious sea kayakers learn to roll -- and these people
> > tend to become (or already are) advanced paddlers.  This makes sea kayak
> > rolling by construction an advanced technique.  But it doesn't have to be
> > that way -- which is the point of the Nigel Foster quote.  Its not an
> > advanced technique in white water paddling.  
> 
> Only very serious sea kayakers _who intend to put themselves in bumpy
> water_ (open ocean, surf, tidal rips) learn to roll, and not all of
> them. This represents a minority of sea kayakers, many of whom don't
> want to see any more than a 2" riffle.
> 
> _All_ ww kayakers intend to put themselves in bumpy water; that's the
> point of the sport, so a roll is basic to ww. Also, a swim in a river
> rapid exposes you to hazards (rocks, undercuts, strainers, keeper holes)
> that a swim in the ocean generally doesn't.

I would pretty much agree with the above two paragraphs, except to say
that I would much rather take a swim in a rocky river than get separated
from my sea kayak in cold PNW water more than 1/4 mile from shore.  I
think the possibility of losing one's sea kayak at sea is very
frightening, and in conditions that would make an average paddler flip,
the chances of losing the kayak are significant, even if friends are
nearby. It doesn't take much wind to send a kayak on its way, forcing a
resucer to choose between rescuing the boat or the paddler. Deep Trouble
chapters 4 and 22 both have stories where the rescuer went for the kayak
first, and was blown downwind faster then the swimmer could swim, thus
forcing the rescuer to abandon the kayak to save the swimmer.

One of the reasons I am so vocal in advocating the roll as a basic skill
is to let sea kayakers know that it is a realistic achievable skill that
almost anyone can learn, and that it increases the overall safety of
individuals and groups TREMENDOUSLY.  I think it is sad that whitewater
paddlers take safety more seriously than sea kayakers in general. I am not
trying to put off anyone on this list, because I think this an excellent
place for paddlers to learn about safety, but the fact that the ACA
considers rolling an advanced skill builds too much complacency in the
general public about the importance of rolling.  I don't mind so much if a
beginning paddler decides that learning to roll is not a priority, as long
as they make it a rational informed decision. It sets me on edge when
instructors or advanced kayakers say that rolling is an advanced skill
needed only by whitewater kayakers and tide rip crazies. Even worse is
when a beginner is told that they won't need to learn to roll if they
avoid rough water. How many stories in Deep Trouble alone depict average
paddlers who start out in calm water and get into trouble when the weather
or current changes, or when they encounter an unknown tide rip? I can
think of four right off the top of my head (chaps 1,6,17,18). 

To sum up, I think all beginning lessons ought to encourage rolling no
matter what. A paddler can then choose to say "rolling is not for me", but
this should not be a decision that is decided for them by others saying it
is not important.

 > 
> > Given that rolling a sea kayak
> > is no harder than rolling a white water boat (except when the  sea kayak
> > fits too loosely in which case they can be a bit harder to roll), there is
> > no reason rolling can't be a basic skill in sea kayaking as well.
> > 
> 
> None, except that most sea kayakers don't feel they need to roll, and
> they're probably right, considering the conditions the intend to paddle
> in. BTW, I know a number of WW kayakers with decent Class III combat
> rolls who were not able to roll even a well-fitting sea kayak at first,
> including me. I would disagree that a sea kayak is as easy to roll as a
> ww boat.

A few comments on this. There are several reasons why sea kayaks can be be
harder to roll because of poor design. One is having sliding footpedals to
control a rudder. This can make rolling much more difficult. I remember
having a lot of difficulty rolling the Northwest kayaks Pursuit outfitted
with a rudder -- at one point I missed four straight rolls and was given a
bow rescue. I really had to concentrate on perfect technique to roll this
boat.  Second, I see few sea kayaks that are outfitted to fit people as
well as a standard whitewater boat. How many sea kayaks have thigh braces
that are well defined hooks? Not too many... most are just little bumps or
even a piece of foam glued underneath a flat deck. Third, width makes a
difference. A 22" sea kayak should be relatively easy to roll, whereas my
26.5" wide and only 7'9" long rodeo kayak is very hard to roll.

Well, I guess that reflects my biases for the day. btw, for those
interested in opinions on the Pygmy Arctic Tern, I am taking mine out for
it maiden voyage this weekend. I will give  report on its performance when
I can.
Cheers,
Kevin

 > > Steve
> -- 
> Test Scoring & Reporting Services       Sometimes, you never can
> University of Georgia                     always tell what you
> Athens, GA 30602-5593                       least expect the most.
> ***************************************************************************
> PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
> Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
> Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
> Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
> ***************************************************************************
> 

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Mark Zen <canoeist_at_netbox.com>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 08:52:54 -0700 (MST)
On Wed, 16 Dec 1998, Mattson, Timothy G wrote:

> 
> Mark,
> 
> I think you missed the point of the Nigel Foster quote.  Your club (at least
> judging from your signature banner) is a sea kayak club.  We all know that
> sea kayakers --- for a variety of reasons -- avoid learning to roll.  White
> water kayakers, on the other hand, are obsessed with rolling.  80% of the
> white water kayakers I know have solid river-rolls and the other 20% are
> working very hard to get theirs.

hi tim,

i think you missed _my_ point... i've included it below. the discussion is
canoes, and as my address [canoeist_at_netbox.com] should also suggest, i
was/am referring to canoe rolling.... as i've also responded to others
off-line...

mark

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:	Mark Zen [SMTP:canoeist_at_netbox.com]
> > Sent:	Tuesday, December 15, 1998 4:14 PM
> > To:	paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
> > Subject:	Re: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan
> > 
> > >>as Nigel Foster pointed out in Sea Kayaker some time ago, a roll is
> > >>considered a basic skill in whitewater, so why not in sea kayaking?
> > >
> > >HMMMM. Now, if a roll is a basic skill in kayaking then what about
> > >canoeing?
> > 
> > rolling is an advanced skill... under 10% can roll in a pool, less than 
> > 5% under combat conditions, at least that's my observation of a 250-300+
> > member club.
> > 
> > mark
> > 
> > #------canoeist[at]netbox[dot]com--------------------------------------
> > mark zen                      o,    o__              o_/|   o_.
> > po box 474                   </     [\/              [\_|   [\_\
> > ft. lupton, co 80621-0474 (`-/-------/----')      (`----|-------\-')
> > #~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~_at_~~~~~~~_at_~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~_at_~~~~~~~~_at_~~~~~
> > http://www.diac.com/~zen/paddler  [index of Paddling websites I manage]
> > Rocky Mtn Sea Kayak Club, Colorado River Flows, Poudre Paddlers
> > The Colorado Paddlers' Resource, Rocky Mtn Canoe Club Trip Page 
> > #-Fortune:
> > "In a world without fences, who needs 'Gates'"
> >         -- Scott McNealy, CEO Sun Microsystems
> > 
> > "In a world without walls, who needs 'Windows'"
> >         -- Dave Livigni
> > 
> > **************************************************************************
> > *
> > PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
> > Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
> > Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
> > Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
> > **************************************************************************
> > *
> 
> 


#------canoeist[at]netbox[dot]com----http://www.diac.com/~zen/mark ----
#
mark zen                      o,    o__              o_/|   o_.
po box 474                   </     [\/              [\_|   [\_\
ft. lupton, co 80621-0474 (`-/-------/----')      (`----|-------\-')
#~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~_at_~~~~~~~_at_~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~_at_~~~~~~~~_at_~~~~~
http://www.diac.com/~zen/paddler  [index to club websites i administer]

Rocky Mtn Sea Kayak Club, Colorado River Flows, Poudre Paddlers
The Colorado Paddlers' Resource, Rocky Mtn Canoe Club Trip Page 
--
Fortune:
"In a world without fences, who needs 'Gates'"
   -- Scott McNealy

"In a world without walls, who needs 'Windows'"
   -- Dave Livigni

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Kirby Stevens <stevens_at_islandnet.com>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 08:12:09 -0800
IMO    Clearly everyone has missed the point, rolling is not the end all for all.    If one has to perform an  Eskimo roll then they are doing something wrong.    Most instructors I know that are any good teach kayakers how to roll last because if you learn to roll early it is generally found that paddlers have  poor paddling techniques and  feel that they can just roll if they make a mistake.

Kirby


-----Original Message-----
From:	Mattson, Timothy G [SMTP:timothy.g.mattson_at_intel.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, December 16, 1998 7:32 AM
To:	'canoeist_at_netbox.com'; paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subject:	RE: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan

Mark,

I think you missed the point of the Nigel Foster quote.  Your club (at least
judging from your signature banner) is a sea kayak club.  We all know that
sea kayakers --- for a variety of reasons -- avoid learning to roll.  White
water kayakers, on the other hand, are obsessed with rolling.  80% of the
white water kayakers I know have solid river-rolls and the other 20% are
working very hard to get theirs.

Clearly, only very serious sea kayakers learn to roll -- and these people
tend to become (or already are) advanced paddlers.  This makes sea kayak
rolling by construction an advanced technique.  But it doesn't have to be
that way -- which is the point of the Nigel Foster quote.  Its not an
advanced technique in white water paddling.  Given that rolling a sea kayak
is no harder than rolling a white water boat (except when the  sea kayak
fits too loosely in which case they can be a bit harder to roll), there is
no reason rolling can't be a basic skill in sea kayaking as well.

The benefits of rolling a sea kayak are almost as great as in a white water
boat.  Its fun to stray into an intense tide rip or pounding surf and being
able to relax 'cause you can fall back on your roll.  It greatly expands the
range of conditions you can safely enjoy.  I qualify my opening sentence
with the word "almost", however, since some portion of the sea kayaking
population chooses to always paddle in calm water and as long as they take
steps to stick to that decision, they may not NEED to know how to roll
(though even they would benefit from the obvious saftey benefits of having a
roll).


--Tim

P.S. Anticipating a response from the gentleman from New York concerning
folding boats, there are boats that are hard to roll by design hence, it is
therefore possible that for these isolated cases, it is not productive to
push acquisition of rolling skills. 



> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Mark Zen [SMTP:canoeist_at_netbox.com]
> Sent:	Tuesday, December 15, 1998 4:14 PM
> To:	paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
> Subject:	Re: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan
> 
> >>as Nigel Foster pointed out in Sea Kayaker some time ago, a roll is
> >>considered a basic skill in whitewater, so why not in sea kayaking?
> >
> >HMMMM. Now, if a roll is a basic skill in kayaking then what about
> >canoeing?
> 
> rolling is an advanced skill... under 10% can roll in a pool, less than 
> 5% under combat conditions, at least that's my observation of a 250-300+
> member club.
> 
> mark
> 
> #------canoeist[at]netbox[dot]com--------------------------------------
> mark zen                      o,    o__              o_/|   o_.
> po box 474                   </     [\/              [\_|   [\_\
> ft. lupton, co 80621-0474 (`-/-------/----')      (`----|-------\-')
> #~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~_at_~~~~~~~_at_~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~_at_~~~~~~~~_at_~~~~~
> http://www.diac.com/~zen/paddler  [index of Paddling websites I manage]
> Rocky Mtn Sea Kayak Club, Colorado River Flows, Poudre Paddlers
> The Colorado Paddlers' Resource, Rocky Mtn Canoe Club Trip Page 
> #-Fortune:
> "In a world without fences, who needs 'Gates'"
>         -- Scott McNealy, CEO Sun Microsystems
> 
> "In a world without walls, who needs 'Windows'"
>         -- Dave Livigni
> 
> **************************************************************************
> *
> PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
> Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
> Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
> Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
> **************************************************************************
> *
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Michael Daly <mikedaly_at_interlog.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 21:25:37 -0500
Kirby Stevens wrote:

> IMO    Clearly everyone has missed the point, rolling is not the end all for all.    If one has to perform an  Eskimo roll then they are doing something wrong.

I roll to cool off on a hot day.  This is wrong???

I learned to roll in a WW kayak and had no problem doing it in my
sea kayak.  In fact, I nailed my offside roll in a sea kayak before
I could get it in a WW.  I don't think it's harder to roll a sea kayak.
It's different, but not harder.

Rolling is fun.   I do it lots in WW since I often get stuck in situations
where an inverted aqueous manouver is appropriate and I don't want
to swim.  I have never _had_ to roll my sea kayak - even in difficult
conditions.  Learning to roll allowed me to learn extended bracing
more easily.  Put me on the side that says you should learn to roll
early in your paddling career and use it to extend your learning
experiences.

Mike

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Rene Milo <rmilo_at_ibm.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 11:21:27 -0500
>
>P.S. Anticipating a response from the gentleman from New York concerning
>folding boats, there are boats that are hard to roll by design hence, it is
>therefore possible that for these isolated cases, it is not productive to
>push acquisition of rolling skills.
>


Ah, but (not to denigrate the unnamed Mr Diaz's abilities :-) ) at the end
of my first season of paddling (this year) I succeeded on only my second
attempt to roll my Feathercraft K1 without much trouble.  I did use an
extended paddle roll (pawlata?), but I am pretty confident that next year
(or maybe this winter if I get into a pool session) that I can "convert"
that into a screw roll (or C to C).

And I definitely agree that having a solid roll will help to be more relaxed
in heavy conditions.  I went to Wales in Sept and although I had done the
successful roll (just the previous week) I did NOT feel that it was
something I could depend on, and I was VERY nervous when I was in any of the
many tidal races that we crossed or played in.

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Mattson, Timothy G <timothy.g.mattson_at_intel.com>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 08:34:41 -0800
Ahhhhh, a meaningless debate about the virtues of rolling.  What fun.  :)

First off, as Mark pointed out, his comments about rolling refered to canoes
-- not kayakes.  So I missed his point. Sorry Mark.

However, I thiink Kirby missed my point and expressed a common misconception
about the role of rolling.  There is no doubt that one role of rolling is to
cover your ass when something goes wrong.  In this case, the need to roll
follows from paddler failure and you could argue that depending on the roll
covered up for poor technique.

I submit, however, that the primary purpose of rolling is to expand your
saftey envelope thereby letting you "play with your kayak".  Rolling lets
you try things you would never try if every flip meant a swim.  For example,
when surfing, I woud never try to get my boat vertical (i.e. an ender)
unless I had a roll.  Yes, the ender is likely to flip me, but its not that
I did something wrong.  I pusposely for my enjoyment pushed the boat into
such a strange attitude that flipping was highly likely.  Any time I play in
the surf --- in a white water boat or a sea kayak -- I flip all the time!!!

This extends across the full range of the sport. I can purposely charge into
a nastey tide rip without worrying that a false move would result in a flip.
I can paddle alone at night in flat water knowing if I hit a submerged log
and flip, I'll come right up with a roll.  It opens up whole so much for the
paddler.  I genuinely feel sorry for people without a roll.  They are
missing out on so much!!!!

Learning to roll, however, is not excuse for failing to get the other skills
required in kayaking.  For example, I know several good white water kayakers
with flawless rolls and solid class IV skills who have no clue about how to
execute a proper forward stroke.  So while I think Kirby missed my point, I
bascially agree with Kirby that rolling must take a back seat to the
fundamental strokes as well as bracing.

--Tim

P.S. Anticipating a reply from the esteemed Mr. Winters, rolling does not
replace the need for sounds judgement.  As a careful reading of "Deep
trouble" will show, even a kayaker with a roll can find them selves in
deadly conditions where their roll can't save them. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Kirby Stevens [SMTP:stevens_at_islandnet.com]
> Sent:	Wednesday, December 16, 1998 8:12 AM
> To:	'Mattson, Timothy G'; 'canoeist_at_netbox.com';
> paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
> Subject:	RE: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan
> 
> IMO    Clearly everyone has missed the point, rolling is not the end all
> for all.    If one has to perform an  Eskimo roll then they are doing
> something wrong.    Most instructors I know that are any good teach
> kayakers how to roll last because if you learn to roll early it is
> generally found that paddlers have  poor paddling techniques and  feel
> that they can just roll if they make a mistake.
> 
> Kirby
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Mattson, Timothy G [SMTP:timothy.g.mattson_at_intel.com]
> Sent:	Wednesday, December 16, 1998 7:32 AM
> To:	'canoeist_at_netbox.com'; paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
> Subject:	RE: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan
> 
> Mark,
> 
> I think you missed the point of the Nigel Foster quote.  Your club (at
> least
> judging from your signature banner) is a sea kayak club.  We all know that
> sea kayakers --- for a variety of reasons -- avoid learning to roll.
> White
> water kayakers, on the other hand, are obsessed with rolling.  80% of the
> white water kayakers I know have solid river-rolls and the other 20% are
> working very hard to get theirs.
> 
> Clearly, only very serious sea kayakers learn to roll -- and these people
> tend to become (or already are) advanced paddlers.  This makes sea kayak
> rolling by construction an advanced technique.  But it doesn't have to be
> that way -- which is the point of the Nigel Foster quote.  Its not an
> advanced technique in white water paddling.  Given that rolling a sea
> kayak
> is no harder than rolling a white water boat (except when the  sea kayak
> fits too loosely in which case they can be a bit harder to roll), there is
> no reason rolling can't be a basic skill in sea kayaking as well.
> 
> The benefits of rolling a sea kayak are almost as great as in a white
> water
> boat.  Its fun to stray into an intense tide rip or pounding surf and
> being
> able to relax 'cause you can fall back on your roll.  It greatly expands
> the
> range of conditions you can safely enjoy.  I qualify my opening sentence
> with the word "almost", however, since some portion of the sea kayaking
> population chooses to always paddle in calm water and as long as they take
> steps to stick to that decision, they may not NEED to know how to roll
> (though even they would benefit from the obvious saftey benefits of having
> a
> roll).
> 
> 
> --Tim
> 
> P.S. Anticipating a response from the gentleman from New York concerning
> folding boats, there are boats that are hard to roll by design hence, it
> is
> therefore possible that for these isolated cases, it is not productive to
> push acquisition of rolling skills. 
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:	Mark Zen [SMTP:canoeist_at_netbox.com]
> > Sent:	Tuesday, December 15, 1998 4:14 PM
> > To:	paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
> > Subject:	Re: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan
> > 
> > >>as Nigel Foster pointed out in Sea Kayaker some time ago, a roll is
> > >>considered a basic skill in whitewater, so why not in sea kayaking?
> > >
> > >HMMMM. Now, if a roll is a basic skill in kayaking then what about
> > >canoeing?
> > 
> > rolling is an advanced skill... under 10% can roll in a pool, less than 
> > 5% under combat conditions, at least that's my observation of a 250-300+
> > member club.
> > 
> > mark
> > 
> > #------canoeist[at]netbox[dot]com--------------------------------------
> > mark zen                      o,    o__              o_/|   o_.
> > po box 474                   </     [\/              [\_|   [\_\
> > ft. lupton, co 80621-0474 (`-/-------/----')      (`----|-------\-')
> > #~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~_at_~~~~~~~_at_~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~_at_~~~~~~~~_at_~~~~~
> > http://www.diac.com/~zen/paddler  [index of Paddling websites I manage]
> > Rocky Mtn Sea Kayak Club, Colorado River Flows, Poudre Paddlers
> > The Colorado Paddlers' Resource, Rocky Mtn Canoe Club Trip Page 
> > #-Fortune:
> > "In a world without fences, who needs 'Gates'"
> >         -- Scott McNealy, CEO Sun Microsystems
> > 
> > "In a world without walls, who needs 'Windows'"
> >         -- Dave Livigni
> > 
> >
> **************************************************************************
> > *
> > PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
> > Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
> > Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
> > Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
> >
> **************************************************************************
> > *
> **************************************************************************
> *
> PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
> Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
> Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
> Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
> **************************************************************************
> *
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Andree Hurley <ahurley_at_viewit.com>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 12:49:15 -0500 (EST)
Well, I have time to jump in here today!

I go along with the "demystify" the roll theory. I like to present it as
just another stroke, and when giving a demonstration will present say, the
low brace, high brace, sweep strokes, discuss the hip snap at some point
and then point out that many of these strokes can be considered a
progression towards a roll. I'll demonstrate the c-to-c and ask people to
watch for commonalities......

I actually think that getting a roll helps towards getting good boat
control.

Andree

 | Hurley Design Communications-Web Site Creation and Implementation  |
 | Bainbridge Island, ahurley_at_viewit.com -> http://www.viewit.com/HDC/|
 | New:     http://www.canoekayak.com/ - http://www.goanimal.com/     |
 |         http://www.claimsmag.com  - http://www.viewit.com/OIWC/    |
    		     http://www.viewit.com/wtr/kayak.html

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: John Somers <somers_at_utmbrt.utmb.edu>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Rolling, was ACA
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 13:12:54 -0600
At 12:49 PM 12/16/98 -0500, Andree Hurley wrote:

>I go along with the "demystify" the roll theory. I like to present it as
>just another stroke, and when giving a demonstration will present say, the
>low brace, high brace, sweep strokes, discuss the hip snap at some point
>and then point out that many of these strokes can be considered a
>progression towards a roll. I'll demonstrate the c-to-c and ask people to
>watch for commonalities......
>
>I actually think that getting a roll helps towards getting good boat
>control.
>
>Andree
>
	Andree, I agree wholeheartedly.  This point is vividly supported by seeing
Maligiaq Padilla or other Greenland native paddlers on videos maneuvering
their sea kayaks through all levels of bracing and rolling.  Body and
paddle control become boat control, and the roll is clearly an extension of
bracing.

	Keep on rollin'
		John Somers

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: <JCMARTIN43_at_aol.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 14:50:07 EST
In a message dated 12/16/98 10:37:28 AM Eastern Standard Time,
timothy.g.mattson_at_intel.com writes:

<< 
 Clearly, only very serious sea kayakers learn to roll -- and these people
 tend to become (or already are) advanced paddlers.  This makes sea kayak
 rolling by construction an advanced technique. >>

Wow, I'm advanced!  Cool!  

But I'm not sure I buy the assumption, Tim.  In fact, the desire to learn to
roll may also be regional.  In the general area around Annapolis, the
Chesapeake Paddlers Association informal groups spend a lot of time working
with members who are interested --- which works out to be most members --- in
establishing some sort of roll, not because it's a CYA maneuver but 'cause
it's fun and because it helps improve other skills and it builds a lot of
self-confidence.  We have a few people who seem to be able to help <anyone>
learn to roll, and we don't make it a big thing.  We figure anyone who wants
to learn <can> learn.  It's not a peer pressure thing at all --- the non-
rollers see the rollers having fun while they have to work at their assisted
and unassisted rescues --- which the CPA <does> stress as a basic requirement
--- and most figure it's a good deal and learn to roll.  There's little
mystique in a roll where most people can do it, so they just decide to learn.
No biggie.  These are newbies and folks with a year or two worth of
experience.  It's part of a game, and we learn 'cause it's fun.

Jack Martin
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Gregory D. Welker <gwelker_at_erols.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 23:52:56 -0500 (EST)
At 09:25 PM 12/16/98 -0500, Michael Daly wrote: Learning to roll allowed me
to learn extended bracing
>more easily.  Put me on the side that says you should learn to roll
>early in your paddling career and use it to extend your learning
>experiences.
>

Learning to roll is like taking the training wheels off!  Once you have a
way back up without leaving your boat you have the confidence to begin
learning other things, like extended bracing, sculling, etc.
Greg Welker

Current Designs Pisces
CLC Cape Charles Modified
West Wight Potter P-19

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: <JCMARTIN43_at_aol.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 00:15:57 EST
In a message dated 12/16/98 11:54:47 PM Eastern Standard Time,
gwelker_at_erols.com writes:

<< 
 Learning to roll is like taking the training wheels off!  Once you have a
 way back up without leaving your boat you have the confidence to begin
 learning other things, like extended bracing, sculling, etc. >>

Within the CPA, at least, we also feel that most of us learn to roll so we
won't have to.  As Greg notes, it opens you up to so many more paddling
experiences.  That's what happens when you demystify the idea of rolling.

Jack Martin
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: <Tomckayak_at_aol.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 07:38:50 EST
In a message dated 12/16/98 11:07:08 AM EST, timothy.g.mattson_at_intel.com
writes:

<<  Given that rolling a sea kayak
 is no harder than rolling a white water boat (except when the  sea kayak
 fits too loosely in which case they can be a bit harder to roll), there is
 no reason rolling can't be a basic skill in sea kayaking as well. >>


OF course Sea Kayaks are harder to roll. Or to put it differently they are
less tolerant of sloppy technique and require a deliberate hip snap. I
encourage people to practice rolling in their Sea kayak not a white water boat
for this reason. 

White water paddlers tend to get narrower boats that feel more like a WW boat
and roll easier.

Other then this one point I agree with what said you.


***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: John Winters <735769_at_ican.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 08:08:34 -0500
Michael Daly wrote;

>Kirby Stevens wrote:
>
>> IMO    Clearly everyone has missed the point, rolling is not the end all
for all.    If one has to perform an  Eskimo roll then they are doing
something wrong.
>
>I roll to cool off on a hot day.  This is wrong???

I think a more careful reading of Kirby's post would be in order. The key
words "has to roll" qualify the statement. If you want to roll, good for
you. Knock yourself out (figuratively speaking, of course) If you
intentionally put yourself in a position that will probably cause you to
have to roll then good for you again. Knock yourself out (figuratively
speaking again, of course)

If, on the other hand, you have to roll through some mistake on your part
then Kirby has hit the mark. Now, some people may find their paddlintg
lives incomplete unless they can do one-hundred and forty-three different
rolls and I say, good for them. Meanwhile, back at the ranch, those who
prefer paddling right side up are getting their kicks looking at the sky,
waves, shoreline, paddling partners - those are nice - and maybe even doing
their strokes all wrong.

It drives paddling instructors right up the wall.

Elsewhere some one said that "serious" paddlers rolled. Well,  I guess I
don't qualify. I patently refuse to roll and all those thousands of
kilometres I spent paddling in open water and never once rolling or even
capsizing were just a dilettante's mucking about in the serious paddler's
rightful territory. There may be other people like me too. That old hacker
Hannes Lindemann couldn't roll his kayak so I guess he wasn't serious.
According to what I have read a lot of Inuit couldn't roll so I guess they
weren't serious either. It just boggles the mind that so many people won't
take sea kayaking seriously.

Why, some serious paddlers even roll for relaxation. I have a friend in the
swimming pool business who also paddles and he sells a rolling pool for
serious kayakers (watch for his unabashedly commercial post here on
Paddlewise soon). I would not doubt that some serious kayakers have logged
more distance rotationally than translationally. And I say, good for them.
When they go to meet their maker I know St. Pete will welcome them with
open arms as good rollers and serious paddlers one and all. The rest of us
will probably get stuck in purgatory paddling upright for eternity.

Well, that might not be so bad.  Maybe the whales will be in purgatory too.

Cheers,
John Winters
Redwing Designs
Specialists in Human Powered Watercraft
http://home.ican.net/~735769/









***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: <rdiaz_at_ix.netcom.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 12:29:44 -0800
John Winters wrote:
> 
> Elsewhere some one said that "serious" paddlers rolled. Well,  I guess I
> don't qualify. I patently refuse to roll and all those thousands of
> kilometres I spent paddling in open water and never once rolling or even
> capsizing were just a dilettante's mucking about in the serious paddler's
> rightful territory. There may be other people like me too. That old hacker
> Hannes Lindemann couldn't roll his kayak so I guess he wasn't serious.
> According to what I have read a lot of Inuit couldn't roll so I guess they
> weren't serious either. It just boggles the mind that so many people won't
> take sea kayaking seriously.

To quote Bart Hauthaway, a fellow esteemed boat-builder like you,
writing in Atlantic Coastal Kayaker back in 1992 "If you can't roll you
aren't a kayaker.  You can be an acceptable person, but you are not a
kayaker."

So, John, at least let us take comfort in knowing that we are
"acceptable" persons which may be the nicest thing any one may have ever
said about us!  :-)

Don't you just love it when individuals set standards for who should be
considered a serious or true practicioner of some endeavor?  It tends to
be a definition that first and foremost fits them.  I think I better go
around saying that somebody who cannot make a folding kayak in less than
10 minutes may be a fine gentleman or gentlelady but he/she ain't no
kayaker. :-)

Thanks for writing this post and all the snipped parts as well.

ralph
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ralph Diaz . . . Folding Kayaker newsletter
PO Box 0754, New York, NY 10024
Tel: 212-724-5069; E-mail: rdiaz_at_ix.netcom.com
"Where's your sea kayak?"----"It's in the bag."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Dan Volker <dlv_at_gate.net>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 11:55:59 -0500
There are plenty of scuba divers who have been diving for over 10 years, who
have never practiced an out of air emergency, and have no experience buddy
breathing. Yet, they consider themselves good divers, who have never had a
mishap.

There will always be plenty of these people, prepared for ideal conditions.

 Being GOOD at your sport, means being able to handle more than just,
"IDEAL" conditions.

Weather is NOT always predictable. If you don't learn to roll well, you
can't say you are as "good" or as "safe" a paddler as your "evil twin", who
has a bulletproof roll, but is otherwise identical to you. Either you will
be restricted to less possible paddling days per year, you will need to stay
closer to shore, or you will need to paddle a sit on top.

Where am I wrong on this ?

Regards,
Dan Volker




-----Original Message-----
From: owner-paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
[mailto:owner-paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net]On Behalf Of John Winters
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 1998 8:09 AM
To: PaddleWise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subject: Re: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan


Michael Daly wrote;

>Kirby Stevens wrote:
>
>> IMO    Clearly everyone has missed the point, rolling is not the end all
for all.    If one has to perform an  Eskimo roll then they are doing
something wrong.
>
>I roll to cool off on a hot day.  This is wrong???

I think a more careful reading of Kirby's post would be in order. The key
words "has to roll" qualify the statement. If you want to roll, good for
you. Knock yourself out (figuratively speaking, of course) If you
intentionally put yourself in a position that will probably cause you to
have to roll then good for you again. Knock yourself out (figuratively
speaking again, of course)

If, on the other hand, you have to roll through some mistake on your part
then Kirby has hit the mark. Now, some people may find their paddlintg
lives incomplete unless they can do one-hundred and forty-three different
rolls and I say, good for them. Meanwhile, back at the ranch, those who
prefer paddling right side up are getting their kicks looking at the sky,
waves, shoreline, paddling partners - those are nice - and maybe even doing
their strokes all wrong.

It drives paddling instructors right up the wall.

Elsewhere some one said that "serious" paddlers rolled. Well,  I guess I
don't qualify. I patently refuse to roll and all those thousands of
kilometres I spent paddling in open water and never once rolling or even
capsizing were just a dilettante's mucking about in the serious paddler's
rightful territory. There may be other people like me too. That old hacker
Hannes Lindemann couldn't roll his kayak so I guess he wasn't serious.
According to what I have read a lot of Inuit couldn't roll so I guess they
weren't serious either. It just boggles the mind that so many people won't
take sea kayaking seriously.

Why, some serious paddlers even roll for relaxation. I have a friend in the
swimming pool business who also paddles and he sells a rolling pool for
serious kayakers (watch for his unabashedly commercial post here on
Paddlewise soon). I would not doubt that some serious kayakers have logged
more distance rotationally than translationally. And I say, good for them.
When they go to meet their maker I know St. Pete will welcome them with
open arms as good rollers and serious paddlers one and all. The rest of us
will probably get stuck in purgatory paddling upright for eternity.

Well, that might not be so bad.  Maybe the whales will be in purgatory too.

Cheers,
John Winters
Redwing Designs
Specialists in Human Powered Watercraft
http://home.ican.net/~735769/









***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************


***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Steve Cramer <cramer_at_coe.uga.edu>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 13:31:50 -0500
John Winters wrote:
> 
> I would not doubt that some serious kayakers have logged
> more distance rotationally than translationally. And I say, good for them.
> When they go to meet their maker I know St. Pete will welcome them with
> open arms as good rollers and serious paddlers one and all. 

At that point, wouldn't they be described as Holy Rollers? Not to be
confused with Hully Rollers, of course.

Steve
-- 
Test Scoring & Reporting Services       Sometimes, you never can
University of Georgia                     always tell what you
Athens, GA 30602-5593                       least expect the most.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Mattson, Timothy G <timothy.g.mattson_at_intel.com>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 10:23:33 -0800
	>  Don't you just love it when individuals set standards for who 
	> should be considered a serious or true practicioner of some 
	>  endeavor?  It tends to be a definition that first and foremost 
	>  fits them. 

Now wait a minute guys -- you're  putting words in my mouth and turning me
into some sort of stuck up monster.  I appologize for bringing this up on
the list, but given that many people out there  only know me from these
postings, I must jump to my defence.

What I said was:

     "Only serious sea kayakers learn to roll  -- and these 
      people tend to become or already are advanced paddlers.  
      This makes sea kayak rolling by construction an advanced 
      technique".  

I then went on to explain that in my opinion this was unfortunate and that
rolling didin't need to be viewed as an advanced technique.

How can you possilby read that as implying that the only way to be a serious
sea kayaker is if you learn how to roll?  Read the statement!!! It doesn't
say "ALL serious kayakers roll".   I would NEVER suggest such a thing.  I
know many people who are VERY serious about their sea kayaking who don't
know  how  to roll.  

Remember --  with email you don't get nuance of speach or body language.
There is also a temporal disconnection between a statement and it replys.
This means you must take pains to avoid reading more into a statement than
is actually there.  

--Tim


***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: <rdiaz_at_ix.netcom.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 15:39:56 -0800
Mattson, Timothy G wrote:

> Now wait a minute guys -- you're  putting words in my mouth and turning me
> into some sort of stuck up monster.  I appologize for bringing this up on
> the list, but given that many people out there  only know me from these
> postings, I must jump to my defence.
> 
> What I said was:
> 
>      "Only serious sea kayakers learn to roll  -- and these
>       people tend to become or already are advanced paddlers.
>       This makes sea kayak rolling by construction an advanced
>       technique".
> 
> I then went on to explain that in my opinion this was unfortunate and that
> rolling didin't need to be viewed as an advanced technique.
> 
> How can you possilby read that as implying that the only way to be a serious
> sea kayaker is if you learn how to roll?  Read the statement!!! It doesn't
> say "ALL serious kayakers roll".   I would NEVER suggest such a thing.  I
> know many people who are VERY serious about their sea kayaking who don't
> know  how  to roll.
> 
> Remember --  with email you don't get nuance of speach or body language.
> There is also a temporal disconnection between a statement and it replys.
> This means you must take pains to avoid reading more into a statement than
> is actually there.

You are absolutely right.  I was picking up on John's take and adding a
statement from someone else of about 6 years ago.  Lumping these
together, I came up with mine, which understandably you have reason to
object to.  So please accept my apologies.

However, I see that John's statement, probably more than mine, brought
out some other points of objection by Dan Volker:

Dan Volker wrote:
> 
> There are plenty of scuba divers who have been diving for over 10 years, who
> have never practiced an out of air emergency, and have no experience buddy
> breathing. Yet, they consider themselves good divers, who have never had a
> mishap.
> 
> There will always be plenty of these people, prepared for ideal conditions.
> 
>  Being GOOD at your sport, means being able to handle more than just,
> "IDEAL" conditions.
> 
> Weather is NOT always predictable. If you don't learn to roll well, you
> can't say you are as "good" or as "safe" a paddler as your "evil twin", who
> has a bulletproof roll, but is otherwise identical to you. Either you will
> be restricted to less possible paddling days per year, you will need to stay
> closer to shore, or you will need to paddle a sit on top.
> 
> Where am I wrong on this ?
> 

I dunno.  If you add a folding kayak to that last paragraph on choices,
it sounds okay to me!  :-) 

ralph

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ralph Diaz . . . Folding Kayaker newsletter
PO Box 0754, New York, NY 10024
Tel: 212-724-5069; E-mail: rdiaz_at_ix.netcom.com
"Where's your sea kayak?"----"It's in the bag."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Richard Culpeper <culpeper_at_geocities.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 15:11:41 -0500
----------
> From: John Winters <735769_at_ican.net>
--snip--
> I have a friend in the
> swimming pool business who also paddles and he sells a rolling pool for
> serious kayakers (watch for his unabashedly commercial post here on
> Paddlewise soon).
--snip--

Rolling pool?  My marathon C1 was squished by one.  I was heaving an empty
hot-tub over a fence.  It got away from me, and rolled right over my poor
boat.  I think I'll pass on rolling pools.

Richard Culpeper
Ring-ding-ding, ring-a-ling-a-ding-ding.

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: <Tomckayak_at_aol.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 22:23:41 EST
In a message dated 12/17/98 9:52:18 AM Pacific Standard Time,
rdiaz_at_ix.netcom.com writes:

<< Don't you just love it when individuals set standards for who should be
 considered a serious or true practicioner of some endeavor? >>

He who lives in a glass house should not throw stones.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: John Winters <735769_at_ican.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1998 08:02:33 -0500
Richard wrote;

(SNIP)

>
>Rolling pool?  My marathon C1 was squished by one.  I was heaving an empty
>hot-tub over a fence.  It got away from me, and rolled right over my poor
>boat.  I think I'll pass on rolling pools.

That's what you get for stealing the cheap versions without brakes.
Whenever I am stealing a rolling pool I check for the CSA or UL sticker
that certifies that proper brakes were installed.

Not sure whether the people who steal rolling pools are Holy Rollers or
not, Steve.
Cheers,
John Winters
Redwing Designs
Specialists in Human Powered Watercraft
http://home.ican.net/~735769/


***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: John Winters <735769_at_ican.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1998 07:50:40 -0500
Ralph wrote;


>To quote Bart Hauthaway, a fellow esteemed boat-builder like you,
>writing in Atlantic Coastal Kayaker back in 1992 "If you can't roll you
>aren't a kayaker.  You can be an acceptable person, but you are not a
>kayaker."
>
>So, John, at least let us take comfort in knowing that we are
>"acceptable" persons which may be the nicest thing any one may have ever
>said about us!  :-)

Flattery will get Bart anywhere.


>
>Don't you just love it when individuals set standards for who should be
>considered a serious or true practicioner of some endeavor?  It tends to
>be a definition that first and foremost fits them.  I think I better go
>around saying that somebody who cannot make a folding kayak in less than
>10 minutes may be a fine gentleman or gentlelady but he/she ain't no
>kayaker. :-)

Hey, I can live with that. We need standards. In fact, it bothers me that
nowhere in the ACA or BCU curriculum do they have time set aside for
teaching how to assemble a folding boat. This kind of bias should not be
condoned.

I suggest we go one step further. If you don't own at least one folding
kayak you are not a serious paddler. :-)

This kind of thing is fun. If we add some more restrictions we can prove
once and for all that there is no such thing as a serious paddler and ask
the Coast Guard to step in and require mandatory boat assembly courses. How
many Inuit ever assembled a foldingf kayak? Bet not many. Just a bunch of
amateurs. Probably  used those skiny paddles that made rolling so easy.
real paddlers sue those wide paddles that make rolling harder.

Shame on you Ralph. You know better than to set me off. :-)

I hope no one gets offended. I am really just kidding around. Well, maybe
just a little.

Cheers,
John Winters
Redwing Designs
Specialists in Human Powered Watercraft
http://home.ican.net/~735769/




***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Michael R Noyes <mnoyes_at_gsinet.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1998 14:10:28 -0500
John Winters wrote:

> I suggest we go one step further. If you don't own at least one folding
> kayak you are not a serious paddler. :-)
>

Does it count if the kayak didn't start life as a folder, but does now?

Mike


--
    Paddling along through fog so thick that only one's thoughts are
visible, your reverie is abruptly shattered by the ancient cry of a great
blue heron as she lifts uncertainly from the brilliant blue of a
mussel-shell beach witnessed only by the brooding, wet spruce....your
passage home seems as much back through time as it does through space.
Mark H Hunt


***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: <rdiaz_at_ix.netcom.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1998 14:33:52 -0800
John Winters wrote:

> I suggest we go one step further. If you don't own at least one folding
> kayak you are not a serious paddler. :-)

Actually there should be levels of seriousness.  Paddlers would be
awarded AKA Fingers which would be akin to the BCU Star system. The AKA
stands for the Assembling Kayak Association.  One Finger goes for
proficiency in assembling a Klepper and Folbots, the lowest level.  Two
Fingers for assembling Nautiraid and Feathercrafts.  Three Fingers is a
level of proficiency not yet reached by any kayaker...the AKA does not
want any paddler to get too cocky.  AKA insists that in speaking of the
awards that no one say that a paddler is "being given the Finger" as
that terminology could be misconstrued. :-)

> How
> many Inuit ever assembled a folding kayak? Bet not many.

Actually, in a sense many did so every year.  My understanding is that
in some parts of the Inuit world, they would be forced to knock down
their boats during the Winter lest the sled dogs eat the skins or chew
on the sinewy stuff holding frame pieces together.  They buried the
skins or used them for other purposes with the intention of sewing new
ones in the Spring.  And they might also break the frame down to a
degree for more effective burying against the paws of hungry dogs or for
compact storage inside igloos.  So, you see Inuit kayaks _were_ folding
kayaks.  The Brits and their followers in the modern kayaking community
just refuse to recognize this.  :-)

> Shame on you Ralph. You know better than to set me off. :-)

I must make a confession here.  When I was growing up in a
Spanish-speaking household, I was often called a "sinverguenza" by my
family.   The term "sin verguenza" means "without shame."  Sometimes
"mal criado" was added, which is Spanish for "badly raised."  Having
both said in the same breath as in "sinverguenza y mal criado" was to
shamelessness what a BCU 5 Star award is to kayaking. :-)

ralph
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ralph Diaz . . . Folding Kayaker newsletter
PO Box 0754, New York, NY 10024
Tel: 212-724-5069; E-mail: rdiaz_at_ix.netcom.com
"Where's your sea kayak?"----"It's in the bag."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: Steve Cramer <cramer_at_coe.uga.edu>
subject: [Paddlewise] Serious kayakers
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1998 15:15:45 -0500
rdiaz_at_ix.netcom.com wrote:
> 
> Actually there should be levels of seriousness.  Paddlers would be
> awarded AKA Fingers which would be akin to the BCU Star system. The AKA
> stands for the Assembling Kayak Association.  One Finger goes for
> proficiency in assembling a Klepper and Folbots, the lowest level.  Two
> Fingers for assembling Nautiraid and Feathercrafts.  Three Fingers is a
> level of proficiency not yet reached by any kayaker...

Makes sense to me. People who assemble folding kayaks have been in
danger of _losing_ fingers for years. I've never actually lost any, but
I've gotten a few good pinches. Now they have a chance to get some back.

Steve (sinverguenza y mal criado)
-- 
Test Scoring & Reporting Services       Sometimes, you never can
University of Georgia                     always tell what you
Athens, GA 30602-5593                       least expect the most.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************
From: John Winters <735769_at_ican.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] FW: ACA meetings: Greenlan
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1998 08:12:23 -0500
Mike wrote;

>
>> I suggest we go one step further. If you don't own at least one folding
>> kayak you are not a serious paddler. :-)
>>
>
>Does it count if the kayak didn't start life as a folder, but does now?

Ralph has more expertise in folders and I would defer to his judgement. See
his comments on folding Inuit.

Ralph also wrote;

 (SNIP)

. >I must make a confession here.  When I was growing up in a
>Spanish-speaking household, I was often called a "sinverguenza" by my
>family.   The term "sin verguenza" means "without shame."  Sometimes
>"mal criado" was added, which is Spanish for "badly raised."  Having
>both said in the same breath as in "sinverguenza y mal criado" was to
>shamelessness what a BCU 5 Star award is to kayaking. :-)

I knew you must be descended from royalty. :-)


Cheers,
John Winters
Redwing Designs
Specialists in Human Powered Watercraft
http://home.ican.net/~735769/

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.gasp-seakayak.net/paddlewise/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:32:54 PDT