PaddleWise by thread

From: John Winters <jdwinters_at_eastlink.ca>
subject: [Paddlewise] Who picks up the rescue tab
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2004 08:26:51 -0400
A jurisdiction's attitude towards paying for rescue seems to reflect the 
economics and traditions of the jurisdiction. In other words, if a nation or 
state or province feels that rescuing people who engage in risky (or at 
least behaviour perceived as risky) behaviour will be good for business they 
will do it. If not, they usually won't unless some tradition or past 
practice supports it.

We should not expect a poor nation to spend a lot of effort and money to 
rescue wealthy North American tourists for free. On the other hand, where 
the economics of the matter justify rescues (say, for example,  rescuing 
skiers in avalanch country in British Columbia) the expenditure makes some 
sense. They want skiers to come to those areas and drop bundles of money so 
why not pay provide rescues if it draws more bucks to the area.

In some countries they have a tradition of rescuing people in danger at sea. 
Economics may foce them to change policies as time goes on and the number of 
stupid, careless, or excessively daring people increases. We should not 
confuse tradition with obligation. Many of these traditions formed at a time 
when most of the people on the sea worked there. Rescues made good economic 
as well as civic sense.

But we should use caution in appling the circumstances surrounding one 
activity to all activities. For example, rescuing people in car accidents. 
Society provides the roads and excersizes control over that use (to varying 
extents) and frequently charges a fee in the form of taxation for that use. 
This creates a strong connection between the user and provider in the form 
of expectations. So much so that some people sue society (the government) 
when they perceive it has failed in its role. Governments don't supply the 
sea although they do excersize some control over its use in coastal waters. 
Many paddlers would rise up in indignation if governments required a license 
to paddle (do any of you remember this topic dicsussed here!!!!). I suspect 
many who would resent this intrusion into their "rights" also would object 
if government failed to rescue them for free.

Of such inconsistencies are our lives composed.

As for myself, I refuse and always have refused to take cell phones, EPIRBs 
or any other device for calling for rescue. I prefer knowing that my 
survival depends upon my own abilities not society. I resent the intrusions 
of society on my life as it is and don't need more when I try to escape. 
Should everyone do  likewise? Not if they don't want to. Should I pay for 
rescuing others who have a different philosophy? Sometimes. I prefer to let 
those who supply rescue services decide who pays and who doesn't. I imagine 
they get pretty good at recognising stupidity. Unfortunately government 
agencies are shackled by rules and regulations born out of our fears that 
they may make a mistake and an unrealistic expectation of perfection in 
government services. In response to this irrational expectation governmental 
agencies tend towards rigid rules and regulations that do not always fit 
circumstances. "We don't provide that service" works better than, 'We made a 
mistake".

Now that you have read this ignore it. It is just my opinion. If you don't 
agree don't bother arguing with me I won't change my mind. :)

Cheers

John Winters
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: RICHARD CULPEPER <culpeper_at_tbaytel.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Who picks up the rescue tab
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2004 12:36:08 -0500
On Sat, 04 Dec 2004 08:26:51 -0400
  John Winters <jdwinters_at_eastlink.ca> wrote:
  . . .
> As for myself, I refuse and always have refused to take cell phones, EPIRBs or any other 
>device for calling for rescue.


What John isn't telllng us is that he knows full well that if he called in for help and was 
rescued, the rescuers would take one look at him and toss him back in the drink.

Richard Culpeper
http://my.tbaytel.net/culpeper/
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: alex <al.m_at_3web.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Who picks up the rescue tab
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 09:48:01 -0800
> As for myself, I refuse and always have refused to take cell phones,
EPIRBs
> or any other device for calling for rescue.

This is of course a persoal choice of everybody.  I'm afraid that now when
EPIRB are small and relatively inexpensive (even those with built-in GPS,
providing 100m precison), there will be many people tempted to carry them, -
and some will actually use them - thinking that they are already in
desperate situation.  I really wish that some rigid regulations were in
place, makin him or her to pay for EPIRB use where there was no
life-threatening situation. (And these fines should be printed in bold
letters in GPS manual :-) - this would stop at least some of such users).
With a EPIRB/PLB the rescue party can't ask any questions that might help
them to make a decision - they only see the distress signal from specified
location.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: John Winters <jdwinters_at_eastlink.ca>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Who picks up the rescue tab
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2004 14:37:26 -0400
Alex wrote;

>  I really wish that some rigid regulations were in
> place, makin him or her to pay for EPIRB use where there was no
> life-threatening situation. (And these fines should be printed in bold
> letters in GPS manual :-) - this would stop at least some of such users).
> With a EPIRB/PLB the rescue party can't ask any questions that might help
> them to make a decision - they only see the distress signal from specified
> location.

Hmmm, I suppose if the rescuers went to rescue some one who didn't need it 
they would not be prosecuted for making them need it. :)

I seem to recall that in Canada fraudulent use of an EPIRB was illegal 
punishable by being tied naked to an pingo in the height of bug season or 
something like that. :) My understanding of the law is tenuous at best but 
colorful (according to my son the lawyer).

Cheers

John Winters
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Gary J. MacDonald <garyj_at_rogers.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Who picks up the rescue tab
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2004 22:16:59 -0500
John Winters wrote:

> I seem to recall that in Canada fraudulent use of an EPIRB was illegal 
> punishable by being tied naked to an pingo in the height of bug season 
> or something like that. :) My understanding of the law is tenuous at 
> best but colorful (according to my son the lawyer).

Not just bug season, black fly season.

GaryJ
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Doug Lloyd <dalloyd_at_telus.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Who picks up the rescue tab
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 22:25:14 -0800
John said:
>> As for myself, I refuse and always have refused to take cell phones,
> EPIRBs
>> or any other device for calling for rescue.
>
 For what it's worth, my radio was stashed deep in my hatch the last time I 
was out on the Columbia Bar. I agree with John, one should be able to 
extricate oneself from trouble of their own making. I do, however, normally 
like my VHF radio handy, as I'm better informed and more a part of the 
marine community when my radio is available and even turned on to listen for 
other water-users in distress, offering head-ups, etc.

There was a recent incident around Victoria shores where a group of kayakers 
came to the aid of a drownings, out-rigger rudder-man, and were able to 
perform rescue breathing after he fainted into the water with the flu.

In terms of John's core sentiments, I do partially disagree: I think there 
are maritime situations that can arise that are beyond the paddler's 
control, and the ability to summon help may be a welcome thing -- if not for 
your own peace of mind, then at least for that of your family's. And perhaps 
SAR staff's too. I mean, imagine Chris Duff breaking his boat along New 
Zealand's inhospitable shores, no radio, overdue, and the searcher's 
possibly out in rough, dangerous conditions looking...

With my rescue experience off the Storm Islands, I certainly know one 
paddler's life was probably saved due to the ability to contact the 
authorities. His only real mistake was choosing his paddling partners. He 
did not carry a radio, but probably appreciated that one was dug out of 
someone's hatch eventually when all efforts at self-extrication from the 
danger disintegrated. The Coasties were extremely happy the rescue was 
called in during the closing hours of daylight, as opposed to a night search 
and subsequent long, possibly drawn out multi-day search in an area of 
frequent storm activity. Nevertheless, I cried like a bratty baby when the 
rescue was called-in (John's type of thinking forming a big knot in my 
normally self-sufficient stomach).

Part of my personal route planning now for solo trips includes pro-activity 
with respect to local boating channels, knowledge of flight-path routes, 
out-of-the-way Fishfarm locations, etc. I also have a list of water-taxi 
companies and calling information for bail-out arrangements, and have even 
worked out prices ahead of time, including contingencies, logistics and 
maximum mileage-ranges with possible vendors. This is part of responsible 
paddling. This is part of your responsibility when planning routes. This is 
part of being a mature paddler -- even when we  (well, me anyway) don't want 
to be.

If you do carry a VHF radio, etc, know how to use your equipment. There was 
another incident recently where a rescue needed to be called in, and the 
paddler using her VHF didn't even know how the thing worked. If your one of 
those people, turn it on next time your out on the water and make some 
chit-chat with the local boaters. Try a little sculling with your one free 
arm and paddle, while you work the radio with the other hand.

If you are paddling in truly remote wilderness, work something out ahead of 
time with a for-hire commercial pilot, etc. In Canada, at least, our federal 
and military rescue-available resources are greatly diminished, not to 
mention the fact that pre-arrangement with a private-sector partner laces 
you on the moral high-ground (better have that Visa limit available, too).

Doug Lloyd
Number of CG rescues - 1
Number of Aux. CG rescues - 1
Number of in-water self-rescues - approx. 10 (aka - wet-reentry)
Number of ocean capsize rescues - approx. 100 (aka - Eskimo Roll, excluding 
surf-play)
Number of imminent ocean capsize rescues - very approx. 10,000 (aka - 
bracing)
Victoria BC
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Dave Kruger <kdruger_at_pacifier.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Who picks up the rescue tab
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 07:49:57 -0800
Never been rescued.  Never needed an extraction from the wilderness.  But, I 
might need one, in future.  Like some others, I have at times felt I "would 
not accept a rescue" and did not notify the authorities before going on a 
tricky climb or hike.  That was 30-plus years ago, and as a single, lone guy, 
no one would have known until way too late, had I gone missing.

But times have changed.  Nowadays, if I were overdue, I could not prevent my 
loved ones from notifying the authorities, and a search would ensue, even if 
I purposely did not tell them where I went.

As the Rev. Carter's sad incident near Sitka illustrates, rescuers place 
themselves at risk just looking for someone in trouble, let alone extracting 
them.

Consequently, I feel it is my moral duty to decrease the chance they would be 
scrambled to come looking for my sorry ass.  If I have a VHF with me, I can 
use it to tell the USCG  **not**  to come looking for me:  I'm fine, just 
sitting on the beach, waiting for the nastiness to pass, enjoying the 
solitude.  In fact, that was the original reason I bought one.

As for an EPIRB/PLB:  I don't like them, and would not use one or take one 
with me unless I were going on an extended trip to some completely off the 
wall, out of the way place where if I got into trouble, there would be no 
chance of any help from passersby.  Then I might take one along.

The guy, a year ago, who went back to retrieve his lost canoe (in New York 
State? -- memory fails) who got nailed with a big fine for activating his PLB 
in conditions the authorities deemed not warranting its use is a bellwether 
for PLB's:  no one knows what the guidelines are for their activation. 
Caveat emptor.

--
Dave Kruger
Astoria, OR 
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Dave Kruger <kdruger_at_pacifier.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Who picks up the rescue tab
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 08:24:13 -0800
Here's the scoop on the canoeist who got fined for his (second) use of a PLB. 
This was discussed here quite a bit in March/April.  Anybody know how this 
turned out?

http://www.paddlermagazine.com/issues/2004_2/article_243.shtml  (down about 
three screens).

--
Dave Kruger
Astoria, OR 
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: alex <al.m_at_3web.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Who picks up the rescue tab
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 10:09:19 -0800
No1 AND No2 - wow :-)... I can understand Big Brother's vexation; it  makes
impressin that he (BB) was affected by emotions in this case, and SAR crew
were people who saw the picture better. Even though on occasion No.2 there
*might* be some mistakes in trip planning, - he countered on the boat as his
fast way out of there (what if the river would have frozen again)?  But this
is just my opinion.

Probably, the very first paddler in North America (but not in 48 states)
that was rescued due to PLB, were those 2 guys (one canadian and one
australian) who paddled in a folding Klepper Quattro somehwere in Northern
Canada.  Eventually they've found themselves on top of moving and crashing
ice on sea, jumped out of the boat and activated PLB. I think Dave read this
link - it was about a year ago. If I recall it right, when the boat has
already disappeared under the ice, and there was no safe spot on the ice
moving and breaking all around them, they heard chop-chop-chop of rescue
helicopter.

> Here's the scoop on the canoeist who got fined for his (second) use of a
PLB.
> This was discussed here quite a bit in March/April.  Anybody know how this
> turned out?
>
> http://www.paddlermagazine.com/issues/2004_2/article_243.shtml  (down
about
> three screens).
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Nick Schade <nick_at_guillemot-kayaks.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Who picks up the rescue tab
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 08:39:34 -0500
On Dec 4, 2004, at 7:26 AM, John Winters wrote:
>
> As for myself, I refuse and always have refused to take cell phones, 
> EPIRBs or any other device for calling for rescue.

For the purposes of debate. If there is a good chance that a search 
will be mounted without your consent, is it a responsible act to have 
tools that will make that search easier. For example, if you tell your 
wife you will be back in 7 days and after 10 days she calls the 
authorities, you now have a search whether you wanted one or not. Not 
knowing your relationship with your wife, I apologize if this scenario 
is impossible. But is it better to have equipment that will make the 
search easier, if there is going to be a search anyways?

I occasionally carry a VHF, but the only time I've used it is to call 
in the sighting of a distress flare. A sailboat had drifted into a tide 
rip and was feeling scared.

Nick Schade

Guillemot Kayaks
824 Thompson St
Glastonbury, CT 06033
USA
Ph/Fx: (860) 659-8847
http://www.guillemot-kayaks.com/
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: John Winters <jdwinters_at_eastlink.ca>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Who picks up the rescue tab
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 10:27:58 -0400
Nick wrote;

> For the purposes of debate. If there is a good chance that a search will 
> be mounted without your consent, is it a responsible act to have tools 
> that will make that search easier. For example, if you tell your wife you 
> will be back in 7 days and after 10 days she calls the authorities, you 
> now have a search whether you wanted one or not. Not knowing your 
> relationship with your wife, I apologize if this scenario is impossible. 
> But is it better to have equipment that will make the search easier, if 
> there is going to be a search anyways?

I have a living will. I expect my wife and children to honor it. It tells 
when and what life saving measures to take and under what conditions to stop 
them once begun. It also tells them what to do with my remains. I expect 
them to honor that as well.

The same applies to my wilderness trips. I prefer a different question. Is 
it a responsible act to initiate a search contrary to some one's  express 
desires?

I see no reason why I should make it easy for them or anyone else to make a 
choice contrary to my will. In fact, taking equipment that makes a search 
easier may imply that I really don't mean what I say. Either I mean it or I 
don't.

Occasionally one has no choice. For example (there may be others) if you 
travel with some one else it often pays to respect their wishes to avoid an 
unpleasant confrontation if they insist on certain gear. Faced with an 
adamant person I usually give in but don't travel with them again. Also, 
some governments insist on certain gear. I don't like it but I respect the 
law.

I consider this kind of thing a PERSONAL philosophy. If anyone disagrees and 
insists on searching for me of their volition then have fun. Enjoy the 
challenge. :)
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: RICHARD CULPEPER <culpeper_at_tbaytel.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Who picks up the rescue tab
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 09:56:24 -0500
On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 10:27:58 -0400
  John Winters <jdwinters_at_eastlink.ca> wrote:
> 
> If anyone disagrees and insists on 
>searching for me of their volition then have fun. Enjoy the challenge. :)

Hmmm  . . . .  You might be on to something there.  Fumbling around trying to find Franklin 
and others led to much adventuring in the low central Canadian arctic, but they had little 
involvement in points east.  John, if you would be so kind as to go missing in Ungava or 
northern Labrador, then we could have a jolly good time searching for you in an area that 
has previously been ignored when it comes to major futile searches.  Cheers to the Empire 
and all that!

Richard Culpeper
http://my.tbaytel.net/culpeper/
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Nick Schade <nick_at_guillemot-kayaks.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Who picks up the rescue tab
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 10:51:32 -0500
On Dec 6, 2004, at 9:27 AM, John Winters wrote:
> I consider this kind of thing a PERSONAL philosophy. If anyone 
> disagrees and insists on searching for me of their volition then have 
> fun. Enjoy the challenge. :)

If it were just your wife doing the searching, I would say this is a 
sufficient answer. However, while your wife or someone else may call 
you in missing, it is rarely that person who puts them-self at risk in 
the search. One example of how equipment such as an EPIRB might help in 
this situation is if the search team knows you have an EPIRB, but you 
have not yet turned it on, they will have good reason not to search for 
you.

Also while your wife may agree to not do anything to save your life, 
she may after 6 months decide that the probate paperwork would be a lot 
easier if she could point to a body. So, despite your best efforts you 
will may end up with a search team looking for you. Do you have any 
responsibility to minimize the risk undertaken by the search team?

I generally agree with your philosophy. One of my friends I paddle with 
is under orders from his wife to carry a cell phone and call in 
everyday. This only serves to make her worry needlessly when there is 
no cellphone coverage, and causes my friend to spend a lot of time 
looking for coverage to keep her from worrying. It is easier when there 
is no possibility for making contact, then the absence of contact is 
not itself a problem. If we were to have a satellite phone, she would 
see no reason why we couldn't call twice a day, and there would be no 
way to explain that water got on the battery and the thing died.

Nick Schade

Guillemot Kayaks
824 Thompson St
Glastonbury, CT 06033
USA
Ph/Fx: (860) 659-8847
http://www.guillemot-kayaks.com/
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Robert Livingston & Pam Martin <bearboat2_at_comcast.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Who picks up the rescue tab
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 20:25:16 -0800
> In fact, taking equipment that makes a search
> easier may imply that I really don't mean what I say. Either I mean it or I
> don't.


Actually, there is a third choice. You meant it when you said it but now,
perhaps having stumbled off a beach log and fractured your wrist miles from
any place, you have changed your mind  :)
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: John Winters <jdwinters_at_eastlink.ca>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Who picks up the rescue tab
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 13:09:32 -0400
Nick wrote;

> If it were just your wife doing the searching, I would say this is a 
> sufficient answer. However, while your wife or someone else may call you 
> in missing, it is rarely that person who puts them-self at risk in the 
> search. One example of how equipment such as an EPIRB might help in this 
> situation is if the search team knows you have an EPIRB, but you have not 
> yet turned it on, they will have good reason not to search for you.

Suppose I take an EPIRB but leave instructios that I will never set it off. 
What then?

Having an EPIRB and then giving instructions that say you will never use it 
doesn't make a whole lot of sense. Sounds like one becomes a slave to the 
EPIRB if you have one.

What did they do before we had EPIRBs? If a person left instructions saying 
don't search then what would you have done?  Has anyone ever disappeared 
without activating a search? How many missing persons are there for whom no 
search has ever been initiated?

> Also while your wife may agree to not do anything to save your life, she 
> may after 6 months decide that the probate paperwork would be a lot easier 
> if she could point to a body. So, despite your best efforts you will may 
> end up with a search team looking for you. Do you have any responsibility 
> to minimize the risk undertaken by the search team?

If she wants to speed things up that becomes her business not mine. Why is 
she in a hurry, Nick? You know something I don't :)

Should we assume that because we can search we must and that because we have 
these devices we must use them? What about these new locator chips they want 
to put in people to protect us from terrorists? Sounds like a good idea 
doesn't it? I mean, we have them, they could be put to good use, shouldn't 
everyone have one?

It lends a whole new dimension to the phrase "The good old days".

Snip
>. If we were to have a satellite phone, she would see no reason why we 
>couldn't call twice a day, and there would be no way to explain that water 
>got on the battery and the thing died.

Technology carries with it burdens and can enslave us even while seeming to 
be good for us..

Richard wrote;

> John, if you would be so kind as to go missing in Ungava or northern 
> Labrador, then we could have a jolly good time searching for you in an 
> area that has previously been ignored when it comes to major futile 
> searches.  Cheers to the Empire and all that!

Richard, you know my feelings about telling the world about those places I 
go that I would prefer to keep quiet and untraveled. The Kimosippi River is 
but one example where I have endeavored to keep the riff-raff out (not 
always with success it seems). It would pain me to think that my private 
places would get over run by club-footed rescuers scattering their gum 
wrappers across the barren wastes. Bad enough that the natives leave their 
surplus snowmobiles every where.

Cheers

John Winters
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: RICHARD CULPEPER <culpeper_at_tbaytel.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Who picks up the rescue tab
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 13:42:11 -0500
On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 13:09:32 -0400
  John Winters <jdwinters_at_eastlink.ca> wrote:
> 
>Richard, you know my feelings about telling the world about those places I go that I would 
>prefer to keep quiet and untraveled. The Kimosippi River is but one example where I have 
>endeavored to keep the riff-raff out (not always with success it seems). It would pain me 
>to think that my private places would get over run by club-footed rescuers scattering their 
>gum wrappers across the barren wastes. Bad enough that the natives leave their surplus 
>snowmobiles every where.
>

It is the world's loss that you will not provide people with directions to and trip notes 
for the Kimosippi.  That such a magnificient river should remain unknown to wilderness 
paddlers is a pity.

Richard Culpeper
http://my.tbaytel.net/culpeper/
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Bob Carter <revkayak_at_aptalaska.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Who picks up the rescue tab
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 09:16:53 -0900
> -----Richard wrote;
>>
>> It is the world's loss that you will not provide people with directions 
>> to and trip notes for the Kimosippi.  That such a magnificient river 
>> should remain unknown to wilderness paddlers is a pity.
>
> The world's loss is my gain.
>





The whites too shall pass -perhaps sooner than other tribes- Continue to 
contaminate your bed and you will one night suffocate in your own waste. 
When the Buffalo are all slaughtered, the wild horses all tamed, THE SECRET 
CORNERS OF THE FOREST HEAVY WITH THE SCENT OF MANY MEN, and the view of the 
hills blotted by talking wires. Where is the thicket, gone. Where is the 
eagle, gone. And what is it to say goodbye to the swift and the hunt, the 
end of living and the beginning of survival
Chief Seattle
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Keith Wrage <keith.wrage_at_charter.net>
subject: [Paddlewise] Chief Seattle's words
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 12:34:51 -0600
>The whites too shall pass -perhaps sooner than other tribes- Continue to 
>contaminate your bed and you will one night suffocate in your own waste. 
>When the Buffalo are all slaughtered, the wild horses all tamed, THE 
>SECRET CORNERS OF THE FOREST HEAVY WITH THE SCENT OF MANY MEN, and the 
>view of the hills blotted by talking wires. Where is the thicket, gone. 
>Where is the eagle, gone. And what is it to say goodbye to the swift and 
>the hunt, the end of living and the beginning of survival
>Chief Seattle

While many of us agree with Chief Seattle's sentiments...it is important to 
note that the above words were NOT spoken or penned by Chief Seattle.  The 
history of this piece of urban mythological prose is quite interesting if 
one digs into it a bit.

K
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Steve Brown <steve_at_brown-web.net>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Chief Seattle's words
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 10:41:53 -0800
It is also important to note that many of us do not agree with these
sentiments.

Steve Brown

-----Original Message-----
 >The whites too shall pass -perhaps sooner than other tribes- Continue to 
>contaminate your bed and you will one night suffocate in your own waste. 
>When the Buffalo are all slaughtered, the wild horses all tamed, THE 
>SECRET CORNERS OF THE FOREST HEAVY WITH THE SCENT OF MANY MEN, and the 
>view of the hills blotted by talking wires. Where is the thicket, gone. 
>Where is the eagle, gone. And what is it to say goodbye to the swift and 
>the hunt, the end of living and the beginning of survival
>Chief Seattle

While many of us agree with Chief Seattle's sentiments.......

K
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: alex <al.m_at_3web.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Chief Seattle's words
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 12:04:07 -0800
> It is also important to note that many of us do not agree with these
> sentiments.

Unforutantely, opinion on this matter won't prevent us from suffocating on
our own waste.   Population is growing, resouces and wilderness areas are
diminishing.  Big 7 have problems with over-production of lunnecessary
items, and 3rd world countries are too busy with feeding themselves to worry
about wilderness.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Steve Brown <steve_at_brown-web.net>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Chief Seattle's words
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 13:03:24 -0800
I'm not sure where you live, but where I live we are not suffocating on our
own waste. I don't seem to be lacking any resources. I have everything I
need and then some. Also, I doubt anyone is over producing anything on a
regular basis since that would be financially self limiting.

If any of you people out there in email land are suffocating on your own
waste or lacking basic living resources I would like to hear from you so I
can try and get you some help for your miserable state. If so, be especially
careful not to let the "waste" get onto your computer keyboard or you won't
be able to send me an email. 

Also I would like to know about any companies who are overproducing so I can
sell their stock short.

*
While I have some sympathy for "native" Americans for the way they were
treated by our forefathers (no guilt though because my kin mostly weren't
here yet), I would hardly consider the leaders of a vanquished peoples to be
an experts on the way life should be lived by others.

Steve Brown

-----Original Message-----
 paddlewise_at_paddlewise.net] On Behalf Of alex

 Unforutantely, opinion on this matter won't prevent us from suffocating on
our own waste.   Population is growing, resouces and wilderness areas are
diminishing.  Big 7 have problems with over-production of lunnecessary
items, and 3rd world countries are too busy with feeding themselves to worry
about wilderness.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: RICHARD CULPEPER <culpeper_at_tbaytel.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Chief Seattle's words
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 18:19:29 -0500
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 13:03:24 -0800
  "Steve Brown" <steve_at_brown-web.net> wrote:
> If any of you people out there in email land are suffocating on your own
> waste or lacking basic living resources I would like to hear from you so I
> can try and get you some help for your miserable state.

I was when I was living in London, Ontario.  Chronic wheezing and coughing.  Been healthy as 
a horse again since moving back north.  As far as paddling goes, the city's sewage overflow 
discharge was immediately above the club.

I'm extremely fortunate to have the best of both worlds:  wilderness and a decent job, but I 
fear that the wilderness is rapidly being reduced in my region (Northwest Ontario).

Richard Culpeper
http://my.tbaytel.net/culpeper/
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Bob Carter <revkayak_at_aptalaska.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Chief Seattle's words
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:29:33 -0900
>steve wrote:
> While I have some sympathy for "native" Americans for the way they were
> treated by our forefathers (no guilt though because my kin mostly weren't
> here yet), I would hardly consider the leaders of a vanquished peoples to 
> be
> an experts on the way life should be lived by others.



Yet you paddle the boats that evolved from their way of life.

Bob 
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Michael Daly <mikedaly_at_magma.ca>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Chief Seattle's words
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 19:03:48 -0500
On 7 Dec 2004 at 13:03, Steve Brown wrote:

> I'm not sure where you live, but where I live we are not suffocating
> on our own waste. I don't seem to be lacking any resources. I have
> everything I need and then some. Also, I doubt anyone is over
> producing anything on a regular basis since that would be financially
> self limiting.

You are either extremely lucky or very ignorant of your own 
existance.  Look up the effects of air pollution on decreasing life 
expectancy in North American cities.  Consider that a significant 
part of your resources, and much of your oil, is imported.  Also, 
contact your local senator or rep for information on how much of your 
tax dollars are spent on financially supporting food production that 
goes nowhere.  Then look up the same for other countries.  Food 
production is the most overly subsidized industry in the OECD and 
there is definitely overproduction.  Starvation in other parts of the 
world is due to an inability to deal with transporting food from 
places where it's overproduced to places where it's scarce.

Mike
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Mark Sanders <sandmarks_at_comcast.net>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Chief Seattle's words
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 16:37:40 -0800
Yes, with our decreasing life expentancy, I long for the good ol' days of
the 1800's when the air was clean and you were lucky to make 40!

> -----Original Message-----

> You are either extremely lucky or very ignorant of your own
> existance.  Look up the effects of air pollution on decreasing life
> expectancy in North American cities.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Steve Brown <steve_at_brown-web.net>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Chief Seattle's words
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 16:57:36 -0800
I know. I must be ignorant because I don't accept all this politically
correct garbage as the gospel truth.

The air in the Los Angeles California area is cleaner than it has ever been
for the time it has been inhabited by humans. A trip to the Museum in
downtown LA will reveal a picture of smog in this area over 100 years ago
and it wasn't new then. Wood fires are worse than current automobiles for
smog.

Speaking of automobiles, when I was a kid, I can remember smog alerts when
it hurt to breathe at all and visibility was only a couple hundred feet.
That doesn't happen anymore.

I have all the oil I need, I have all the food I need. I would be shocked if
anyone on this list has a different experience. If so, loose your internet
connection and buy food with the money. 

I will concede that food is overproduced in the US as a government subsidy
to farmers. It doesn't fall victim to natural economic forces because the
government does it at my expense without my consent. OK, but we do ship some
of that food elsewhere. This allows us to help some people and also exercise
some political leverage on the people that need it. Also, the surplus
insures that I have plenty of it. I'm in favor of shipping more of it to
people who need it though.

In any case, starvation in other parts of the world is not because the USA
over produces food, it is because they under produce it. We should help
where we can, but we didn't create the problem.

Nevertheless, I don't view this issue as the global meltdown of life as we
know it. It's not perfect, but it actually serves Americans quite well
because we never run out of food.

My recollection is that fossil and other records of "native" Americans
indicate that their food supply was not nearly as robust as our. It seems to
me our way of life works better. 

Steve Brown

-----Original Message-----


You are either extremely lucky or very ignorant of your own 
existance.  Look up the effects of air pollution on decreasing life 
expectancy in North American cities.  Consider that a significant 
part of your resources, and much of your oil, is imported.  Also, 
contact your local senator or rep for information on how much of your 
tax dollars are spent on financially supporting food production that 
goes nowhere.  Then look up the same for other countries.  Food 
production is the most overly subsidized industry in the OECD and 
there is definitely overproduction.  Starvation in other parts of the 
world is due to an inability to deal with transporting food from 
places where it's overproduced to places where it's scarce.

Mike
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: PeterO <rebyl_kayak_at_iprimus.com.au>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Chief Seattle's words
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 19:55:39 +1100
Steve wrote:
>If any of you people out there in email
>land are suffocating on your own waste or
>lacking basic living resources I would like
>to hear from you

G'Day Steve and Paddlewise,

One of the reasons I prefer sea kayaking to river kayaking is that rivers
here are just too degraded. In Australia as in much of the rest of the world
our ground water is becoming brackish and many of our rivers are
contaminated. For example, not that its that important, but the Hawkebury
Classic 114km kayak race was nearly cancelled this year because of blue
green algae blooms. Interesting to note you can use brackish water and blue
green algae to make biodiesel very effectively. Wouldn't want to practice
rolling in or drinking from a stream containing such algae though,
apparently it can be quite toxic.

Smarter use of water in: agriculture, environmental control and cities, is a
topic of intense debate in Oz right now. I've got enormous faith in our
ability to overcome obstacles especially when we collaborate. But what are
the implications for paddling anywhere in 50 years time. It could be a very
different experience to the one we value today, not worse just different.
For example consider the likely role of marine biomass in food and fuel
production. And the possible role of kayaks as energy efficient vehicles in
such an enterprise:~)

Isn't it imperative then that those of us who have access to hidden places,
record for others what we see without revealing the location to the greedy
or inept. The world might then understand the value of these places now and
in the future can at least relish the memory of wnat once was. I would
willingly buy such a book written by the Rev Bob Carter or John Winters or
Dr. Peregrine Inverbon, Melissa Reese, Doug Lloyd, Dave Kruger, Natalie
Wiest and all you other great contributors from Paddlewise.

Of course this isn't an underhand attempt to receive lots of great trip
reports because I'm temporarily incapacitated in the south:~)

All the best, PeterO
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: alex <al.m_at_3web.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Chief Seattle's words
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:37:03 -0800
> I'm not sure where you live, but where I live we are not suffocating on
our
> own waste. I don't seem to be lacking any resources. I have everything I
> need and then some. Also, I doubt anyone is over producing anything on a
> regular basis since that would be financially self limiting.

Pretty close to Chief's Seattle area - BC.  A couple of days ago I've heard
on TV, that if it was a country, it would've been (don't remember - 3rd?
single-digit number anyway) country in the world in greenhouse gas emissions
(though method of calculation wasn't clear - per capita, or per sq ft).  Too
much dependence on cars in Greater Vancouver area, poorly developed public
transportation.  Same in Seattle, - if not worse. Over-production goes hand
in hand with over-consumption.  Are two cars per family necessary? Yes, if
there is no other way of getting to work.  Otherwise - no.  Is new car
necessary, when previous one is still fine, albeit wife would like to show
"them" that your family can afford a new one?    Yes, - because nobody would
convince her in the opposite.  People have tons of useless stuff in their
homes, - merely going to garage sales would reveal this pretty well :-)...
Most of it was unnecessary at the moment of purchase. Slippery ground,
anyway... Are our kayaks really necessary?  We don't have to hunt or fish to
survive...

To my best knowledge, most resources are aren't renewable.  We might have
them "enough", our children might not.   I'm not even sure that we have them
"enough" - otherwise gas prices in North America wouldn't depend on Iraq and
Middle-East situation.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: PeterO <rebyl_kayak_at_iprimus.com.au>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Chief Seattle's words
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 06:49:11 +1100
Steve wrote: -
>It is also important to note that many
>of us do not agree with these sentiments.

G'Day,

Leaving aside the first phrase about 'whites', I read it as a rather
sensible warning, not so much a sentiment.

There's a fine line though between making a beautiful area well enough
understood that people value and protect it and so well known that it is
destroyed.

All the best, PeterO
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: RICHARD CULPEPER <culpeper_at_tbaytel.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Chief Seattle's words
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 18:12:18 -0500
In Kimosippi country, it is open season for dam developers.

The more paddlers know an area, the greater the chance that they and other environmentalists 
might have in protecting the area from far more serious damage than that brought by 
paddlers.

In other words, protect it or lose it.  And if you want to protet it, you had better 
popularize it.

Richard Culpeper
http://my.tbaytel.net/culpeper/
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: <Rcgibbert_at_aol.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Chief Seattle's words
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:40:37 EST
In a message dated 12/7/2004 10:39:11 AM Pacific Standard Time, 
keith.wrage_at_charter.net writes:


> >The whites too shall pass -perhaps sooner than other tribes- Continue to 
> >contaminate your bed and you will one night suffocate in your own waste. 
> >When the Buffalo are all slaughtered, the wild horses all tamed, THE 
> >SECRET CORNERS OF THE FOREST HEAVY WITH THE SCENT OF MANY MEN, and the 
> >view of the hills blotted by talking wires. Where is the thicket, gone. 
> >Where is the eagle, gone. And what is it to say goodbye to the swift and 
> >the hunt, the end of living and the beginning of survival
> >Chief Seattle
> 
> While many of us agree with Chief Seattle's sentiments...it is important to 
> note that the above words were NOT spoken or penned by Chief Seattle.  The 
> history of this piece of urban mythological prose is quite interesting if 
> one digs into it a bit.
> 

Try this link to see an interesting article on the subject. While discussing 
that, you might be interested to know Chief Joseph's "speech" is thought by 
many to be a composite dramatization of what he actually said that day on the 
northern plains of Montana.

http://www.archives.gov/publications/prologue/spring_1985_chief_seattle.html

Rob G
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Duane Strosaker <strosaker_at_yahoo.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Chief Seattle's words
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 15:10:26 -0800 (PST)
Paddlewisers,

What I got out of the chief speech reminded me of
what I heard from a comedian. It was something
like our progress has gone from being a monkey
eating a banana in the jungle to a human being
heating up a Hot Pocket in microwave at a 7/11.
It is this progress that has probably driven us
all to be kayakers.

Duane
Southern California
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Bob Carter <revkayak_at_aptalaska.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Chief Seattle's words
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 11:48:36 -0900
    I knew when I posted the quote that therer was a dispute over who 
actually wrote them and should in hindsight have said "attributed to".
    To point I was trying to make was about keeping secret special places in 
the wilderness. When I first started white water raft guiding on the new 
river in West Virginia back in the late 70's. There was a trail leading to a 
spectacular over look of the lower gorge the locals called "beauty mountain" 
It was a wonderful place just to go and  take in the splendor and meditate 
on life. For a while most of the guides kept the trail location secret for 
we feared more and more people would find it and overrun it. Eventually 
enough guides brought their best tipping customers there and soon the crowds 
showed up and so did those ready to party.
    Were we selfish in wanting to keep this special place a secret? Yes! 
Were we wrong? Debatable!
    The point is when wilderness becomes inundated with people it loses the 
essence of being wilderness. Crowds bring pollution, enviornmental 
destruction, and noise. Not to mention soiled soggy piles of toliet paper. 
My pet peve is to see an article in an outdoor magazine saying: The top 10 
secret wilderness camping/hiking/ canoeing ect. spots revealed. Once every 
one goes there it is no longer special.
    I don't begrudge someone not wanting to reveal a secret spot. After all 
they appearently went to great effort to find it. I have found in my travels 
to take a great effort to discover a secret spot adds to the wonder and joy 
of being there.
Bob
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Todd Miller <felsenmeer_at_tranquility.net>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Chief Seattle's words
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 18:29:28 -0600
"Steve Brown" wrote:
> I'm not sure where you live, but where I live we are not suffocating on
our
> own waste.

Interesting.  Just out of curiousity, is your home water supply treated, or
can you just run outside and dip your cup in the creek?

~~~~~~~~~~
Theirs is a hidden land; wolf-haunted,
Stormy highlands with perilous paths,
Where mountain torrents plunge through the mists
And flow unseen...

-Beowulf
~~~~~~~~~~
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Jordan Engel <jengel_at_gmavt.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Chief Seattle's words
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 17:33:27 -0500
Hello All,
Is it fair to keep others from our "secret" places but still continue 
to go there ourselves?  Certainly, they will remain unspoiled if not 
many people tramp over them but it seems a little elitist to say that 
only the few of us who will treat the sites well should go to them.  
Perhaps, it would be better if we stopped searching for "secret" places 
or as outdoors people agree that we are just not going to explore 
certain areas so that they remain unspoiled.

Jordan
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Steve Brown <steve_at_brown-web.net>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Chief Seattle's words
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 17:01:46 -0800
Cool!

You all do that so I can have those areas for myself and my friends.

Steve Brown

-----Original Message-----


Hello All,
......
Perhaps, it would be better if we stopped searching for "secret" places 
or as outdoors people agree that we are just not going to explore 
certain areas so that they remain unspoiled.

Jordan
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: <kiayker_at_sbcglobal.net>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Chief Seattle's words
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 18:51:04 -0800
>>I know. I must be ignorant because I don't accept all this politically
correct garbage as the gospel truth.
 And yadda yadda yadda


   I was born and raised in sunny Southern California, where you also live
Steve. I have witnessed first hand the consumption of the free spaces where I
used to hunt and camp and explore. I grew up listening to stories from my
father, who also grew up here, about how wonderful this place used to be when
he was younger. Now I find myself telling the same sort of stories to my kids
about my own youth. We do not have access to our beaches like most other
states do in that a large portion of our coastline, or at least access to it,
is now private property. According to law anything below the mean high tide
line is public access. But just try to spend the night on that "public" land
and you will most likely find yourself pleading your case to the judge. How
may times a year are our beaches closed due to sewage leaks? Every single
camping guide to Southern California that I have read in the last twenty or so
years says that ALL water in our local wilderness environments should be
filtered due to contaminants. The Fish and Game regulations have warnings
about eating ANY seafood that might have come from certain locations - Palos
Verdes, an area that you frequently paddle, is one of them. I have a book,
"Fifty Golden Years," which was signed by the author in 1957, about the
history of Newport Beach from 1909 to 1956 which records, among other
significant historical highlights, the outstanding fishery that used to exist
here. It's pretty much all gone now. Yet you smugly deny that we are using up
our resources. I guess ignorance is bliss.

Scott
So.Cal.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Steve Brown <steve_at_brown-web.net>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Chief Seattle's words
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 05:27:54 -0800
I know, my ignorance is pitiful. If only I could become a self loathing
liberal, ashamed of the success of my culture everything would be better.

I didn't say that there is no habitat reduction or no pollution. I said I am
not suffocating in my own waste or lacking basic resources (or even
indulgent ones). Those gross exaggerations are what trigger the sharp
polarization in views of the environment. 

Of course I wish I could hunt in the places I used to hunt, but people built
houses there. I could be mad about that and try to demand that the house I
was living in be the last one built, but that does seem a bit self-centered.
Doesn't it?

I haven't noticed anyone on this list volunteering to tear down their home
and return the place where they live back to its original state. If any of
you did I would be more open to your view and if several did I might
actually begin to question my views on this subject. 

We use resources, but are we using them up? Did "native" Americans ever hunt
out an area and move to another? Of course they did. Predator / prey cycles
are normal and self limiting. When fishing production in an area becomes
unprofitable, fishermen are forced to move elsewhere. It's a cycle that has
been in play for as long as humans have existed. Well, actually that cycle
predates humans, because animal predators do it and even herbivores do the
exact same thing with vegetation.

Purifying water? Giardia has been around for a long time. It is spread by
animals as well as humans and is not a product of modern civilization. You
think diarrhea from bad water is a modern invention?

Whoever made that statement about "suffocating in their own waste"
undoubtedly had fewer resources, more sickness, less free time, and likely a
shorter life span than anyone on this list. That statement is not only
inaccurate; it seems to be the desperate venting of a man whose culture is
being displaced by a more successful one. Almost like "You'll be sorry when
I'm gone"

I am in favor of sensible habitat protection, increased coastal access,
water pollution reduction, and well thought out game management, but
hysterical exaggerations about the environment are not going to get my
endorsement or gain my cooperation in making things better. 

Steve Brown
 

-----Original Message-----
   I was born and raised in sunny Southern California, where you also live
Steve. I have witnessed first hand the consumption of the free spaces where
I
used to hunt and camp and explore. I grew up listening to stories from my
father, who also grew up here, about how wonderful this place used to be
when
he was younger.... We do not have access to our beaches like most other
states do in that a large portion of our coastline, or at least access to
it,
is now private property. ...... How
may times a year are our beaches closed due to sewage leaks? Every single
camping guide to Southern California that I have read in the last twenty or
so
years says that ALL water in our local wilderness environments should be
filtered due to contaminants. The Fish and Game regulations have warnings
about eating ANY seafood that might have come from certain locations - Palos
Verdes, an area that you frequently paddle, is one of them. I have a book,
"Fifty Golden Years," which was signed by the author in 1957, about the
history of Newport Beach from 1909 to 1956 which records, among other
significant historical highlights, the outstanding fishery that used to
exist
here. ....... I guess ignorance is bliss.

Scott
So.Cal.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: RICHARD CULPEPER <culpeper_at_tbaytel.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Chief Seattle's words
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 08:56:59 -0500
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 05:27:54 -0800
  "Steve Brown" <steve_at_brown-web.net> wrote:
> I know, my ignorance is pitiful. If only I could become a self loathing
> liberal, ashamed of the success of my culture everything would be better.


That's a rediculously unfounded and extraordinarily rude thing to say.


Richard Culpeper
http://my.tbaytel.net/culpeper/
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Carey Parks <cparks_at_fuse.net>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Chief Seattle's words
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 09:48:50 -0500
I suspect most paddlers harbor some appreciation or respect for the
environment in which we paddle, or they'd just get a rowing machine and
paddle in front of the telly.

That said, this is a paddling forum.  Since someone quite inadvertantly let
the genie out of the bottle, the messages regarding man's role in the
universe are beginning to outnumber those I get for drugs and organ
enhancement. May I respectfully submit that those who are pursuing this
(very worthy!) line of discussion may find a better forum at one of the
following addresses:

http://www.sierraclub.org/
http://www.bcca.org/ief/	(a Baha'm-inspired organization addressing the
environment and sustainable development)
http://www.epa.gov/
http://www.cyburbia.org/ 	(Talk about planning, cities, the built
environment or anything else on your mind, with hundreds of other Cyburbia
users from around the world.)
hDevelopment)

Fair winds,

Carey
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: RICHARD CULPEPER <culpeper_at_tbaytel.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Chief Seattle's words
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 19:02:55 -0500
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 09:48:50 -0500
  "Carey Parks" <cparks_at_fuse.net> wrote:
> 
> That said, this is a paddling forum.  

So discussion of protection of the paddling environment is central to paddling.

For example, on Lake Superior, there are three hot spots for sea kayakers:  Wawa, where 
paddlers are fighting a proposed quarry; Terrace Bay, where paddlers have been instrumental 
in bringing in a National Marine Conservation Area; and the Apostles, where sea kayaking and 
environmentalism are combined by the Inland Sea Society and it's major symposium.

If you personally are not into the paddling environment, fair enough, but others, such as 
myself, are.  So given my druthers, I'd prefer to see more discussions of the paddling 
environment, and what we can do to preserve it.

Richard Culpeper
http://my.tbaytel.net/culpeper/
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Brian Curtiss <bc_at_asdi.com>
subject: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 17:22:37 -0700
After testing an Outback oven with my 20+ year old MSR on-or-off 
stove, its clear that I need something that provides much better 
flame regulation.  Which stoves provide the ability for a low simmer 
and for precise adjustment of the flame?  Are the canister stoves the 
best choice if simmering and flame control is of first priority?

Thanks, Brian Curtiss
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Keith Wrage <keith.wrage_at_charter.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 22:16:12 -0600
I use my MSR DragonFly with my Outback oven with success.  As with all 
MSRs, the noise level is slightly annoying.  FWIW, the Outback oven is one 
camp luxury that I love.

I have a small isobutane canister stove that works well (and is tiny!) but 
I was disappointed that when I ran it full out boiling water the canister 
frosted up and stove performance dropped.  Ambient temp was roughly 50 deg 
F.  Have others had this experience with this type of stove?  I know people 
talk about poor low temp performance of these stoves but I always thought 
they were talking about < 40 deg F.  Also, white gas is MUCH cheaper to run 
than the canisters.

K
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Victor Okunev <venuko_at_gmail.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 01:09:23 -0800
Definitely MSR DragonFly! Three thumbs up! The stove is perfect,
except for the noise. But on the flip side, I feel such a relief when
I finally turn it off; that feeling alone well justifies the extra
noise. Also, when you travel alone, you may actually enjoy the noise;
it makes you feel that you've got a companion :) In the case if the
jet gets dirty, this clever stove has a built-in jet shaker; so you
can clean it up by simply shaking the stove head.

Make sure if you buy one off the Internet, get the model with the new
pump; I think it is 2004 model. I''ve got mine from
http://www.backcountry.com/ and I highly recommend that store.
Periodically they put MSR equipment on sale, so you may want to wait
if you're not in the rush.

Vic.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Mary Zuschlag <mzuschlag_at_comcast.net>
subject: re: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 21:08:56 -0800
I use 2 stoves that simmer quite well.  I use the MSR dragonfly for small
groups it is a multi-fuel stove that does a nice job on simmer, but it is
better for small groups.  For large groups I use the Coleman one burner
stove with a propane cylinder. The Dragonfly is a little slow for larger
groups; I'll use it for 1 to 3 people.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: MICHAEL SILVIUS <M.Silvius_at_worldnet.att.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 09:27:26 -0500
Brian:
I have an Optimus multi fuel that is basicaly the same as the MSR (that I
have as well) but better built. No plastic parts. All cast aluminum and
titanium and can be fully dissassembled. All screws no rivets. So it is easy
to maintain and repair.
Optimus and  Primus make very nice multyfuel adjustable stoves. they burn
kero, diesel, avgas, car gas, or white gas. Primus even has the optional
converter accessory so you can attach a butane canister (MSR type.)
I believe MSR has also steped up to the plate and is now making an
adjustable stove. The only disadvantage is the adjustable Primus/Optimus
type are quite noisy as they do not have a flame diffusser as the old MSRs
but have a single hole jet w/ a smal dish type diffuser on top.
check the link out:
http://www.optimus.se/products/nova/

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Brian Curtiss" <bc_at_asdi.com>


> After testing an Outback oven with my 20+ year old MSR on-or-off
> stove, its clear that I need something that provides much better
> flame regulation.  Which stoves provide the ability for a low simmer
> and for precise adjustment of the flame?  Are the canister stoves the
> best choice if simmering and flame control is of first priority?
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Dave Kruger <kdruger_at_pacifier.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 06:56:07 -0800
Brian,

Cheaper than any of the others suggested so far, and pretty good on the 
simmer:  the Coleman Exponent Dual Fuel Featherlight 442, which burns white 
gas and unleaded gasoline.  Not as good for simmering as the cannister 
stoves, but goes low enough for the Outback, I believe.  Of course, Coleman 
fuel (aka white gas) cost is 1/4th that of the cannisters; unleaded gas, 
1/16th.
http://www.campmor.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?productId=8169781&memberId=12500226

--
Dave Kruger
Astoria, OR

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Brian Curtiss" <bc_at_asdi.com>

>> After testing an Outback oven with my 20+ year old MSR on-or-off
>> stove, its clear that I need something that provides much better
>> flame regulation.  Which stoves provide the ability for a low simmer
>> and for precise adjustment of the flame?  Are the canister stoves the
>> best choice if simmering and flame control is of first priority? 
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Greg Dunlap <blackey_at_sonic.net>
subject: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 17:18:59 -0800
How about a pressurized alcohol burning stove?  I carry a Trangia Mini as a
backup if all else fails but wish that I could get away with only one fuel
source.  Anyone know of such an item as a pressurized alcohol stove>
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Robert MacDonald <RMacDonald_at_udl.com>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 08:32:23 -0800
The best simmering stove I have found is the old Coleman 505 "Pocket" stove.  The ones from 15-20 years ago are the ones to get.  They have TWO controls, one that acts as the classic "turn up to light, left to run and right to off" knob, and another that combines an orifice cleaning tool with a very precise and functional simmering control.

More recent versions have only a single knob, that is supposed to combine the left, up and right knob with simmering control.  It doesn't work, it is digital.  If it looks like it is simmering, it is really dying slowing, and will go out when least expected.  DON'T get one of these!

The best source of these old stoves is garage sales.  I bought one to replace my venerable 1978 model for C$20.  The old one I gave away to someone who was similarly frustrated with the inability of many stoves to simmer.  The old one still ran great, but too many pasta and oatmeal boil-overs had rotted away the lower wind guard under the burner.  

These are good stoves, robust and quite field-strippable (when the oatmeal boils over!) with a pair of pliers.  I have had way too many problems with MSR's that haven't been maintained to trust them.  

The next best bet are the simple propane stoves that take the screw-on bottle.  Anywhere from $15 - $30 apiece. Simpler to operate, simmer well, cheap, but you wind up carrying heavy cylinders. They don't work well below freezing, either.


Have fun.

Rob.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: <Rick.Sylvia_at_ferguson.com>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 11:55:31 -0500
> cheap, but you wind up carrying heavy cylinders. They don't work well
> below freezing, either.

I can't comment on the primary topic, but I can add a comment to the
"below freezing" comment.  

For non car camping, I use a Primus Yellowstone Lite stove (3 years
old).  It's the canister type.  It's supposed to be fine above freezing.
But, I couldn't get it to work at all one morning when the temps had
dipped to a mere 45 degrees Fahrenheit.  By lunch time (higher temps),
it was fine, and for a late dinner after the sun had set (dropping
temps), it was iffy.

That night, I stuffed it in the foot of my sleeping bag (which I also do
with clothing) and the next morning, it worked like a champ due to my
body heat keeping it toasty.  Most of you know that trick, but there may
be a few readers who don't, so for what it's worth... there it is.

Rick
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: <Rcgibbert_at_aol.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 12:08:05 EST
In a message dated 12/8/2004 4:23:41 PM Pacific Standard Time, bc_at_asdi.com 
writes:


> After testing an Outback oven with my 20+ year old MSR on-or-off 
> stove, its clear that I need something that provides much better 
> flame regulation.  Which stoves provide the ability for a low simmer 
> and for precise adjustment of the flame?  Are the canister stoves the 
> best choice if simmering and flame control is of first priority?
> 

My MSR Whisperlite International works well enough to call it simmering. It's 
also a multi fuel so I can burn kerosene where they do not have white gas. 
The Dragonfly simmered great, but the Dragonfly has a very CHEEZY weld on the 
bottom and regular use caused my 100 dollar Dragonfly to fail early on. I hate 
crap gear. The cannister stoves work great and do have a regulated flame. The 
problem is they focus the flame on a very small area and you'll carbonize 
anything in that area. There is a cannister/multifuel stove that has the more 
functional large stove surface.

Rob G
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Jackie Myers <jackie_at_muddypuppies.com>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 10:47:49 -0800 (PST)
> The next best bet are the simple propane stoves that take the screw-on bottle.  Anywhere from $15 - $30 apiece. Simpler to operate, simmer well, cheap, but you wind up carrying heavy cylinders. They don't work well below freezing, either.
> 

On one paddling trip we reached 9 degrees F (my shoes 
froze overnight).  I was carrying a single-burner 
Coleman propane camp stove.  My stove was the 
only one in the group that would work.  No amount of 
pumping would get the other stoves working.  I had a 
long line of folks waiting to use it.  It has never 
failed me in below-freezing temps.  After that 
experience, several in my group "converted."  Disposal 
of the empty propane bottles is a pain, though.

btw, Walmart carries a stainless steel two-burner propane 
stove.  Good price, lightweight, compact, good for salt-water
conditions, and good price (around $40), made by Brinkmann.  
The only info I could find online was on EBay

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=16036&item=7116725276&rd=1

Jackie
http://www.muddypuppies.com/
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Michael Daly <mikedaly_at_magma.ca>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 16:58:35 -0500
On 9 Dec 2004 at 10:47, Jackie Myers wrote:

> On one paddling trip we reached 9 degrees F (my shoes 
> froze overnight).  I was carrying a single-burner 
> Coleman propane camp stove.  My stove was the 
> only one in the group that would work.  No amount of 
> pumping would get the other stoves working.  I had a 
> long line of folks waiting to use it. 

Interestingly, I've had exactly the opposite happen to me, where my 
old Coleman 505 white gas stove lit and no other would.  A hot 
breakfast in the snow was definitely appreciated by those with non-
functional pressurized gas stoves.

Here in the Great White North not many would put a lot of faith in a 
pressurized gas stove in the winter, preferring liquid fuel.  When it 
gets cold, liquid gas stoves are more likely to light - however, it 
does take a bit of experience.  Preheating the burner is as essential 
as pumping.  If you don't use some fuel as a starter (or a starter 
paste for some) the evaporation of the liquid fuel won't happen and 
the stove won't light properly.  There seems to be a correlation 
between stove success and experience in cold weather.  I've never had 
a problem with either my old 505 or my Dragonfly in winter. YMMV.

Mike
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: MICHAEL SILVIUS <M.Silvius_at_worldnet.att.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 19:55:31 -0500
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jackie Myers" <jackie_at_muddypuppies.com>
>
> On one paddling trip we reached 9 degrees F (my shoes
> froze overnight).  I was carrying a single-burner
> Coleman propane camp stove.  My stove was the
> only one in the group that would work.  No amount of
> pumping would get the other stoves working.


Jackie.
It has been my experience that the cartridge stoves because they require
heat (absorbed form the ambient) in order to convert the liquid
butane/propane to gas do not work in cold weather.(note how the canisters
frost up when used in colder temps) On winter Xcountry ski trips in to
Baxter State Park (Maine/USA) in January I have experienced 10 to 15 bellow
zero F. and the canister stoves only work if you keep the cartridges warm
next to your body previous to using them, something not really feasible all
the time. Liquid fuel Primus/Optimus and MSRs have never failed when used
properly. Consistently I am able to have boiling within less than 4 minutes
from the time I take the thing out of my pack. I higly recomend investing in
one. You wont regret it.
michael
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: alex <al.m_at_3web.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 16:58:49 -0800
> > The next best bet are the simple propane stoves that take the screw-on
bottle.  Anywhere from $15 - $30 apiece. Simpler to operate, simmer well,
cheap, but you wind up carrying heavy cylinders.

Yes, such cylinders are heavy (usually green Coleman ones, but those longer
blue ones from welding departmments also work - same gas, same thread,
different shape of canister).  Although, who cares about 1.5 lb cylinder in
a kayak?
No, they don't simmer well.  At least non-brand name that I used (Escort?),
but Coleman $25 screw-on-top single-burner appears to have same narrow-band
regulator.
Another feature that I don't like in them, is that it is difficult to
arrange wind screen around the burner lifted high above the ground.
Altogether it was the reason to switch to Primus Easyfuel with its own
supporting legs, good pre-heating system, wider range regulator, and
built-in ignitor.  Wind screen should not be placed so that ignitor would be
between the screen and pot - reflected heat will melt its plastic housing.
It is easier to simmer with a good windscreen.
My other, perhaps less important,  reason to switch to Primus was that it
fits inside GSI "hard anodized aluminum boiler":
http://www.campmor.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?memberId=125
00226&productId=25030137
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: ~Holmes <holmes375_at_yahoo.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 17:43:50 -0800 (PST)
I live in Wyoming, thus much of my stove usage in the winter involves cold temperatures and high altitudes.

Canister stoves are certainly convenient when used within their environmental parameters, but I stay with gas stoves for their reliability on winter trips.

One of my biggest beefs with canister stoves is the inability to know what my fuel stores are.

I've used the MSR Draginfly over the last few years with complete satisfaction.  Bought it used and it already had the improved pump.  Switched this past summer season to the MSR Simmerlite as the Dragonfly is incredibly loud with its 'Boeing effect'.  This really bothered me this year while camping on Shosone Lake in Yellowstone, hence the change.  The Simmerlite is great and simmers better than the Dragonfly.

The Dragonfly is now a backup stove and loaner.  I also have an MSR Pocket Rocket, canister stove, used when car camping and want to make more involved meals than I do when kayak camping.

The MSR Dragonfly, Whisperlite, Simmerlite, etc., are all great reliable stoves when used properly and maintained properly.  Such use and maintenance is not difficult.

Pleasant waters.

Holmes
 The all-new My Yahoo!  Get yours free!    
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: alex <al.m_at_3web.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 11:34:13 -0800
> to many liquid fuels.  I have a similar model called Primus Easyfuel
> (without simmering control, I don't do fancy cooking in field, and it's
> regulator has pretty wide range anyway).

I forgot to mention - Primus Easyfuel doesn't burn any liquid fuel - only
butane cartrides.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: <Rick.Sylvia_at_ferguson.com>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 16:55:31 -0500
> Disposal
> of the empty propane bottles is a pain, though.

When I first had empties (from my two burner coleman I use for car
camping) to dispose of, I called the City.  Talked to two clueless
people, who suggested the County.  Three clueless people at the county,
but one suggested BFI, the local refuse collection company.  Two
clueless people there.  I next called the police department.  No clue.
Called our equivalent of a hazardous materials office... clueless.  I
called the company who provided propane for supplying homes.  Again, no
clue.  Talked to the manager of a hiking/camping store in this area...
clueless.

Well, I said screw it and tossed them in the trash can with everything
else.

Two years later, I accidentally found the right person thru casual
conversation at one of my kids soccer games.  His recommendation.....
"no special requirements... just toss them."  He did specify, "as long
as they are empties."

I still don't think that's right, but it's what I'm doing.  Jackie...
what are you having to do?  Just curious.

Rick
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: J Pivovar <kayak_at_headwinds.org>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 18:07:32 -0500
While I don't think propane stoves are the best for kayak camping, I do 
use them at home and car-camping etc.  I really hate the waste of the 
canister, though.   I was delighted to find a little valve that enables 
you to refill the canister.  I bought mine at Harbor Freight: 
www.harborfreight.com/cpi/ctaf/Displayitem.taf?itemnumber=45989

Jennifer

>>Disposal
>>of the empty propane bottles is a pain, though.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: MICHAEL SILVIUS <M.Silvius_at_worldnet.att.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 18:34:45 -0500
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <Rick.Sylvia_at_ferguson.com>


> > Disposal
> > of the empty propane bottles is a pain, though.
>
>> I still don't think that's right, but it's what I'm doing.  Jackie...
> what are you having to do?  Just curious.
>

I spoke w/ my local camping store in Portland Maine about the recycling of
butane/propane canisters. The answer from them was drain them fully and then
punch a hole in the side w/ a claw hammer or a screwdriver, drill etc. to
visibly show they are empty. Please do make sure you fully empty them before
puncturing them. Then they are readily accepted by any recycling facility.

Here in New England we are fortunate in that there is a fairly well
established recycling system. Here in Maine we have the big dumpsters w/
bins for paper, cardboard, plastics and metals next to our big supermarkets
and town and or public works offices. I am not sure what the standards are
for rest of the country as far as establised recycling practices go, but
once perforated the canisters are ok to dump in the recycle bins.

regards: Michael
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Jackie Myers <jackie_at_muddypuppies.com>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 17:47:39 -0800 (PST)
> From: "Michael Daly" <mikedaly_at_magma.ca>

> Interestingly, I've had exactly the opposite happen to me, where my 
> old Coleman 505 white gas stove lit and no other would.  A hot 
> breakfast in the snow was definitely appreciated by those with non-
> functional pressurized gas stoves.
 
Wonder if altitutde might have anything to do with the opposite
results (being at a relatively low altitude in Texas at the time)?

jackie
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Michael Daly <mikedaly_at_magma.ca>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 01:20:35 -0500
On 9 Dec 2004 at 17:47, Jackie Myers wrote:

> Wonder if altitutde might have anything to do with the opposite
> results (being at a relatively low altitude in Texas at the time)?

I'd expect the opposite - altitude, with lower outside pressure, 
would make it easier for a pressurized container to dump its fuel.  
I'd guess that you were dealing with some combination of a relatively 
full canister, warm canister or luck.  If you were in direct 
sunlight, the dark green canister can be warmed by the sun.  If 
there's one thing I appreciate in the winter, it's sunlight!

Mike
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Jackie Myers <jackie_at_muddypuppies.com>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 18:05:58 -0800 (PST)
> I still don't think that's right, but it's what I'm doing.  Jackie...
> what are you having to do?  Just curious.

I did pretty much the same as you.  Called around, fretted, wondered,
pondered, debated, tried to find out if I could get them refilled
(answer was 'nope'), then eventually tossed the empties. 

Jackie
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Dave Kruger <kdruger_at_pacifier.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 18:23:30 -0800
Someone mentioned a refill fitting for those green Coleman bottles.  I 
believe it is illegal in the US to refill them, but OK in Canada, yes?

The waste inherent in all that metal, just for a little stove fuel, is 
ridiculous.
.
--
Dave Kruger
Astoria, OR

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jackie Myers" <jackie_at_muddypuppies.com>

> I did pretty much the same as you.  Called around, fretted, wondered,
> pondered, debated, tried to find out if I could get them refilled
> (answer was 'nope'), then eventually tossed the empties. 
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Jackie Myers <jackie_at_muddypuppies.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 18:11:32 -0800 (PST)
From: J Pivovar <kayak_at_headwinds.org>
> While I don't think propane stoves are the best for kayak camping, I do 
> use them at home and car-camping etc.  I really hate the waste of the 
> canister, though.   I was delighted to find a little valve that enables 
> you to refill the canister.  I bought mine at Harbor Freight: 
> www.harborfreight.com/cpi/ctaf/Displayitem.taf?itemnumber=45989

Well, that's fantastic!  :-)  Solves the problem, the puzzle, the
waste, the storage.  btw, I prefer them for all kinds of camping.
I find them very easy to use and boils water faster than any other
single burner camp stove I've seen.

Thanks for the link, Jennifer!  

Jackie
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Dave Kruger <kdruger_at_pacifier.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 18:31:04 -0800
Here is the link which I found that describes the "illegal" act involved in 
refilling the Coleman canisters:
http://www.scouter.com/archives/Scouts-L/199911/0503.asp

I went out to the garage and checked my (recently purchased) Coleman propane 
bottles.  The statement is still on the bottles.  I guess if you don't 
tranport them, it's OK to refill them (wink wink).

--
Dave Kruger
Astoria, OR

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jackie Myers" <jackie_at_muddypuppies.com>

> From: J Pivovar <kayak_at_headwinds.org>
>> While I don't think propane stoves are the best for kayak camping, I do
>> use them at home and car-camping etc.  I really hate the waste of the
>> canister, though.   I was delighted to find a little valve that enables
>> you to refill the canister.  I bought mine at Harbor Freight:
>> www.harborfreight.com/cpi/ctaf/Displayitem.taf?itemnumber=45989
>
> Well, that's fantastic!  :-)  Solves the problem, the puzzle, the
> waste, the storage.  btw, I prefer them for all kinds of camping.
> I find them very easy to use and boils water faster than any other
> single burner camp stove I've seen. 
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: MICHAEL SILVIUS <M.Silvius_at_worldnet.att.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 21:35:39 -0500
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Greg Dunlap" <blackey_at_sonic.net>

> How about a pressurized alcohol burning stove?  I carry a Trangia Mini as
a
> backup if all else fails but wish that I could get away with only one fuel
> source.  Anyone know of such an item as a pressurized alcohol stove>


Check out this site. if it is not there you wont find it anywhere.
http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~we2a-sod/english/menuie.htm

theres some prety funky ones here.
from the minis to the humongous 3 burner himalayan base camp Primus stoves.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: MICHAEL SILVIUS <M.Silvius_at_worldnet.att.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 21:39:04 -0500
a more direct link to the stove page:

http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~we2a-sod/stove/stoveie.htm
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: alex <al.m_at_3web.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 18:18:05 -0800
> How about a pressurized alcohol burning stove?  I carry a Trangia Mini as
a
> backup if all else fails but wish that I could get away with only one fuel
> source.  Anyone know of such an item as a pressurized alcohol stove

Same here - carry it as a backup only (with 1 liter plastic bottle of
alcohol).  Though, short of losing some tiny LPG stove part in sands
(happened once with no-name LPG stove),  in my conditions of paddling I can
imagine only one occasion when  it could fail - that is when LPG cylinder
becomes empty and if I don't carry a second one.
Alcohol is ineffective and therefore bulky fuel, - even in a kayak. Though,
it has its advantage in a day-trip; you can fill tiny Trangia burner with 2
oz of alcohol (1 short meal or coffee) and go, without any canisters or
cylinders.
I think that liquids can hardly be pressurized.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Matt Broze <mkayaks_at_oz.net>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 20:18:41 -0800
Robert MacDonald wrote:
>>>>>The best simmering stove I have found is the old Coleman 505 "Pocket"
stove.  The ones from 15-20 years ago are the ones to get.  They have TWO
controls, one that acts as the classic "turn up to light, left to run and
right to off" knob, and another that combines an orifice cleaning tool with
a very precise and functional simmering control.<<<<<<

I agree but let me pass along a word of warning. unfortunately these stoves
have a limited life. The seal at the top of the fuel tank gets old and can
fail when under pressure. The first time this happened to me I had got the
stove started cleanly but needed to top up the pressure as the starting
procedure bleeds off some of the air in the tank to improve the mixture
until the stove gets hot enough to vaporize the gas before it is metered.
(Note: the better simmering stoves meter vapor rather than liquid. once the
fuel volume has been expanded some 900 times or so it's much easier to fine
tune.) Anyway, I picked up that stove that I had used back packing for years
and started pumping up the pressure to where it should be. Just as I started
to wonder what was making my hand cold and wet, my hand burst into flames. I
dropped the stove in the gravel and started beating my hand into the gravel
trying to extinguish the flames on it. I saw the stove was engulfed in
flames and realized the tank could explode if the flames burning around it
lasted much longer. I warned everybody near to back away. My hand
extinguished, I was about to try to dump enough gravel on to it to dose the
flames when George Gronseth (who I'd met for the first time as or separate
groups shared the same campsite) ran up with a pot he'd dipped in the nearby
water. He poured the water over the stove to cool it and that spread fire
all around the gravel area where I was cooking as the gas floated on the
water. Several more potfulls kept the stove cool until the fire burned out.
I don't know if the stove was fixable but after all the salt water it was
all rusty by the time I returned home anyway. George said many people he
knew had had similar incidents. I liked the stove well enough that I
replaced it with the updated version. Now I pay a lot of attention to the
possibility of a leak when I pump the stove when it is burning. I leave it
on the ground and watch where I put my hand to hold it in place while
pumping. I didn't get burned. The vaporizing gas on my hand kept it cool
enough while it also fed the flames. Later, I wondered what it was about the
fire that hade made my hand hurt even though I wasn't burned, then I
remembered pounding my hand into the gravel to try to put out the flames and
the source of the pain was clear.


Matt Broze
www.marinerkayaks.com
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Jackie Myers <jackie_at_muddypuppies.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 20:20:16 -0800 (PST)
> From: "Dave Kruger" <kdruger_at_pacifier.com>

> Someone mentioned a refill fitting for those green Coleman bottles.  I 
> believe it is illegal in the US to refill them, but OK in Canada, yes?

The company's corporate office is in California (took a while to find
that on the website).  I have never heard it's illegal to fill them,
just not possible (not saying it is legal, though).  So I don't
know.  If it's illegal, how can they sell them in this country...
"HarborFreight.com" "America's Favorite Tool Store"

Jackie
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: <Warrenstevens_at_earthlink.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 21:20:12 -0500
On Dec 9, 2004, at 8:18 PM, Greg Dunlap wrote:
> Anyone know of such an item as a pressurized alcohol stove>

There are designs for home made "pressurized" alcohol stoves:

http://home.comcast.net/~agmann/stove/BasicPressureBurner.htm

I haven't built one yet though it's on my winter list as it would be a 
useful skill to have when traveling via air. I've had a devil of a time 
with alcohol stoves in below freezing temps, but they do work.

Canister stoves do vary by quality of canister, the MSR iso-butane seem 
to function the best in the cold and they are said to perform better in 
higher altitudes. I've seen a hand warmer applied to the stove canister 
get a canister stove performing well enough to make several rounds of 
jello shots in 200 F temps. If you want an adjustable stove that 
simmers canister stoves will be your best bet if you are choosing from 
backpacking stoves. Larger, bulkier pressurized stoves may also work 
well in this regard

Note that empty canisters may be left attached to the stove overnight 
with the valve open to equalize pressure and then crushed under the 
heel. In the U.S. to the best of my knowledge they can be recycled.

-Warren
(who is so new to paddling that he would have a 1/2 star rating)
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: <Rick.Sylvia_at_ferguson.com>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 08:01:12 -0500
> I spoke w/ my local camping store in Portland Maine about the
recycling of
> butane/propane canisters. The answer from them was drain them fully
and
> then
> punch a hole in the side w/ a claw hammer or a screwdriver, drill etc.
to
> visibly show they are empty. Please do make sure you fully empty them
> before
> puncturing them. Then they are readily accepted by any recycling
facility.

Well, maybe I'm just ignorant, so let me ask this question, just in
case.... 

I consider my bottles to be empty when the burner on the Coleman stove
or the lanterns go out.  So, is that empty or not?

There may be situations where that just means the pressure is too low to
push the gas into the burner or something.  So, is that empty enough, or
do I need to do something else, like heat the bottle and continue to
drain, or some other process, until the bottle is "really empty" as
opposed to just "seemingly empty".

Sheeezzzzzz... life sure was easier before I got hooked up with
knowledgeable people :-) 

Rick
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: alex <al.m_at_3web.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 11:12:48 -0800
> I consider my bottles to be empty when the burner on the Coleman stove
> or the lanterns go out.  So, is that empty or not?
>
> There may be situations where that just means the pressure is too low to
> push the gas into the burner or something.  So, is that empty enough, or
> do I need to do something else, like heat the bottle and continue to
> drain, or some other process, until the bottle is "really empty" as
> opposed to just "seemingly empty".


It would be difficult to define when it is really "empty", since some
percentage of this gas is present even in the air that we inhale every
second, but after the burner goes out at room temperature, there might still
be enough gas left to explode when tank is heated (as somebody wrote
earlier).  This is physics; gas will expand, increasing the pressure, when
heated. Drilling a hole or cutting a slot through will ensure that it is,
lets put it that way, *empty enough*.  Though, I'm worried about possible
explosion ignited by the spark when drilling or cutting.  There shouldn't be
any spark in normal process of drilling by normal human :-), but who
knows...
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: MICHAEL SILVIUS <M.Silvius_at_worldnet.att.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 10:09:28 -0500
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <Rick.Sylvia_at_ferguson.com>
To: <M.Silvius_at_worldnet.att.net>; <paddlewise_at_paddlewise.net>

> Well, maybe I'm just ignorant, so let me ask this question, just in
> case....
>
> I consider my bottles to be empty when the burner on the Coleman stove
> or the lanterns go out.  So, is that empty or not?

Rick:

Around here in Maine the saying goes:

" well now, b'jeeezzus - - - ya-can't-tell - - - - not knowing. ---- 
can-ya-now????  "
(pronounced with correct Down East inflection)
(( please forgive the religious refference, used only for contextual
accuracy and implying no endorsement of any sort what so ever))

I should think it would be sufficient to run them dry, and attempt to
relight them and then while attached to the stove w/ the control valve open
puncture the canister????

no one ever blamed me of being to smart!!!!

merry-rama-hana-quansmas to yaall:
;-)
Michael
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: <Rcgibbert_at_aol.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 11:01:03 EST
In a message dated 12/16/2004 6:54:52 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, 
M.Silvius_at_worldnet.att.net writes:

Then they are readily accepted by any recycling facility.



I've never had one rejected by my curbside pickup. I do leave them 
conspicuously each time to test.
 
Rob G
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Joseph Pylka <jpylka_at_earthlink.net>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 15:24:37 -0500
> I consider my bottles to be empty when the burner on the Coleman stove
> or the lanterns go out.  So, is that empty or not?

	Probably not...  What I do normally is push a wire or thick toothpick down
the connector to open the valve and let the remaining pressure equalize. 
Then I punch a hole in the side of the canister with a geopick.  Never
worried about sparks....

Joe P.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: alex <al.m_at_3web.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 11:18:50 -0800
> I have an Optimus multi fuel that is basicaly the same as the MSR (that I
> have as well) but better built. No plastic parts. All cast aluminum and
> titanium and can be fully dissassembled. All screws no rivets. So it is
easy
> to maintain and repair.
> Optimus and  Primus make very nice multyfuel adjustable stoves. they burn
> kero, diesel, avgas, car gas, or white gas.

Agreed.  There is one by Primus with simering control (Primus Omnifuel, if
i'm not mistaken), that also burns Primus/MSR butane cartridges, in addition
to many liquid fuels.  I have a similar model called Primus Easyfuel
(without simmering control, I don't do fancy cooking in field, and it's
regulator has pretty wide range anyway).  LPG (butane) cartridges are
probably THE easiest to use under most of conditions that kayaker could
encounter, and don't need any maintenance.  They are quite lightweight too
(though green Coleman tanks are heavier, and don't fit to Primus stoves -
thread has to be replaced).
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Ray Dangman <rdangman_at_orofino-id.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 21:32:28 -0800
Brian Curtiss wrote:

   Which stoves provide the ability for a low simmer
> and for precise adjustment of the flame?  Are the canister stoves the
> best choice if simmering and flame control is of first priority?



The Coleman Apex II is an unleaded/white gas model with excellent flame
control.  Plus it looks like the moon landers.
http://www.campmor.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?productId=6934803&memberId=12500226
Also, I saw at the REI site that the oven manufacturer does not recommend
that a stove with the flame over the fuel canister be used, due to heat
build-up.

Best wishes
Ray Dangman
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: WhiteRabbit <whiterabbit_0117_at_charter.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 22:06:44 -0600
IMHO - As a long time Outback oven user, nothing I've found works as well as 
the liquid fuel Apex.  It will simmer and be stable under about any 
condition.  Since a lot of baking uses quite  a bit of fuel, I like the 
concentrated power of the liquid fuel.  The MSR Simmerlite is supposed to be 
good with the oven, I haven't tried it.

I have a concern about using the Outback Oven with any burner that is 
mounted on the fuel tank. I know people do it successfully, I still worry 
about overheating the fuel.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
When logic and proportion Have fallen softly dead,
Remember what the dormouse said:
"Feed your head. Feed your head. Feed your head"
-WhiteRabbit

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Brian Curtiss" <bc_at_asdi.com>
Subject: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer


> After testing an Outback oven with my 20+ year old MSR on-or-off stove, 
> its clear that I need something that provides much better flame 
> regulation.  Which stoves provide the ability for a low simmer and for 
> precise adjustment of the flame?  Are the canister stoves the best choice 
> if simmering and flame control is of first priority?
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: alex <al.m_at_3web.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 18:52:22 -0800
> canister, though.   I was delighted to find a little valve that enables 
> you to refill the canister.  I bought mine at Harbor Freight: 
> www.harborfreight.com/cpi/ctaf/Displayitem.taf?itemnumber=45989

 How will you know when smaller tank is full?  Looks like dangerous to me.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: alex <al.m_at_3web.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 19:14:38 -0800
> I went out to the garage and checked my (recently purchased) Coleman
propane
> bottles.  The statement is still on the bottles.  I guess if you don't
> tranport them, it's OK to refill them (wink wink).

"DOT-39 NRC 232/290 M1110
Federal Law forbids transportation if refilled -
Penalty up to $500,000 fine and 5 years
imprisonment (49 U.S.C. 5124) "

- sounds like you're right, refilling isn't a crime per se.  Would paddling
with such a canister be a "transporting"? :-)
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Allan McLane <amcl_at_sover.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 22:49:09 -0500
On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 19:14:38 -0800, alex wrote:

- sounds like you're right, refilling isn't a crime per se.  Would paddling
with such a canister be a "transporting"? :-)

Getting it from where you filled it to wherever else you may take it would be a serious no-no. One of the big concerns is hydrostatic failure due to over-filling.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Dave Kruger <kdruger_at_pacifier.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 12:37:31 -0800
The concern about safely decommissioning propane canisters is valid.  Running 
them until nothing else comes out is the best you can do for emptying.  At 
that point, there will be so little propane inside (and no air), that it 
should be OK to penetrate the canister.  If you are really concerned about 
sparking, avoid steel tool surfaces and carbide tool surfaces at penetration. 
A pointed brass or copper tool will not spark.  In addition, if you submerse 
the can during the penetration, the surrounding water will protect you.

A mild steel penetrator, such as a sturdy nail (8 to 16 penny is good), 
should not spark, either.  It takes hard steel, such as the head of a hammer, 
or a drill bit, to form a spark.

Of course, do the penetration outdoors, and wear safety glasses.

--
Dave Kruger
Astoria, OR
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "alex" <al.m_at_3web.net>

> Re:  <Rick.Sylvia_at_ferguson.com> 's question:
>> I consider my bottles to be empty when the burner on the Coleman stove
>> or the lanterns go out.  So, is that empty or not?

> It would be difficult to define when it is really "empty", since some
> percentage of this gas is present even in the air that we inhale every
> second, but after the burner goes out at room temperature, there might 
> still
> be enough gas left to explode when tank is heated (as somebody wrote
> earlier).  This is physics; gas will expand, increasing the pressure, when
> heated. Drilling a hole or cutting a slot through will ensure that it is,
> lets put it that way, *empty enough*.  Though, I'm worried about possible
> explosion ignited by the spark when drilling or cutting.  There shouldn't 
> be
> any spark in normal process of drilling by normal human :-), but who
> knows... 
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Michael Daly <mikedaly_at_magma.ca>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] looking for a stove that can simmer
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 16:44:45 -0500
On 17 Dec 2004 at 12:37, Dave Kruger wrote:

>  In addition, if you submerse 
> the can during the penetration, the surrounding water will protect
> you.

The deeper the better.  It will also make sparks a non-issue.  Dave's 
advise is the best so far.

Mike
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Steve Brown <steve_at_brown-web.net>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Chief Seattle's words
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 09:06:39 -0800
Though I realize in hindsight that it could be construed that way, what I
said was not meant to be an insult to Scott. He is not self loathing and I
don't know if he is a liberal or not. I wanted to articulate what I felt I
needed to become to stop incurring the wrath of those on the other side of
the debate. That is, to stop being called ignorant for not agreeing with
them.
Apologies for the misunderstanding because my goal is to keep debating to
the facts without attacking the person.

Steve Brown
 

-----Original Message-----

  "Steve Brown" <steve_at_brown-web.net> wrote:
> I know, my ignorance is pitiful. If only I could become a self loathing
> liberal, ashamed of the success of my culture everything would be better.


That's a rediculously unfounded and extraordinarily rude thing to say.


Richard Culpeper
http://my.tbaytel.net/culpeper/
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Dave Kruger <kdruger_at_pacifier.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Chief Seattle's words
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 06:59:17 -0800
"Steve Brown" <steve_at_brown-web.net> wrote:

> I am in favor of sensible habitat protection, increased coastal access,
> water pollution reduction, and well thought out game management, but
> hysterical exaggerations about the environment are not going to get my
> endorsement or gain my cooperation in making things better. 

I can agree with that.  Let's move on.  I'm done.

--
Dave Kruger
Astoria, OR
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Dave Kruger <kdruger_at_pacifier.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Chief Seattle's words
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 20:23:41 -0800
Woof.  It is very difficult for this native Californian (who left in 1966 for 
a cleaner, less crowded part of the West Coast of North America) to 
countenance a view of that cesspool down there which regards it as relatively 
unpolluted.

I lived through the smog alerts of the '50's and '60's, and as a chemist, 
understand the huge investment made in pollution control laws and technology 
which allow the air in the greater LA Basin to be cleaner (emphasis: 
cleanER) than it was in the bad old days of no restrictions on emissions and 
no catalytic converters on autos.  But, not cleaner than it was in the early 
'50's (yeah, I am that old -- and I go back far enough that I surfed on a 
balsa board, and had cherry point breaks to my lonesome!).

To regard what Los Angelenos breath as relatively unpolluted, or to regard 
the quality of surface waters in Southern California as anything near to 
pristine is pure thought buggery.

Chief Seattle's non-words notwithstanding, who questions that worldwide air 
quality and water quality conditions are deteriorating?  Just look around, 
with your memory intact.

Double woof.

--
Dave Kruger
Astoria, OR 
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: alex <al.m_at_3web.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Chief Seattle's words
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 16:29:46 -0800
> myself, are.  So given my druthers, I'd prefer to see more discussions of
the paddling
> environment, and what we can do to preserve it.

Perhaps such topics really belong to some other environment-oriented forums.
I just want to check some thoughts.  The least we can do (to preserve) is
leaving campsites in more or less same condition as they were before.  In
national/provincial etc parks there are either garbage cans, or
take-in-take-out rule.  The problem is, what if it's not any protected area
(no garbage cans or state-funded cleaners), but still nice to camp, and it
is not feasible to fill and load a garbage bag at the beginning of long
trip.  I normally make a little bonfire before paddling off, burning
everything that can be burned (like toilet paper), and throw in empty tin
cans, then flatten them between two rocks, and bury in sand.  (Throwing in
aslo a couple of somebody else's "items" from previous days and years). A
sort of making a sacrifice to the weather god :-) - though I didn't have a
chance to notice his positive reaction so far.  My understanding is that
fire destroys protective layers on cans (made to slower down their
corrosion), and they will disappear faster. Probably it would corrode faster
in sea water, but in sand it doesn't increase visual contamination and won't
cut anybody. Hopefully animals won't dig it out, since it doesn't have any
attractive smell after the fire.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Steve Brown <steve_at_brown-web.net>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Chief Seattle's words
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 16:38:59 -0800
I think cans last years when buried, but I guess it depends on what they are
made of. I thought most were made of aluminum or steel, but not tin
anymore?????

Steve Brown

-----Original Message-----
........  I normally make a little bonfire before paddling off, burning
everything that can be burned (like toilet paper), and throw in empty tin
cans, then flatten them between two rocks, and bury in sand....... My
understanding is that
fire destroys protective layers on cans (made to slower down their
corrosion), and they will disappear faster. Probably it would corrode faster
in sea water, but in sand it doesn't increase visual contamination and won't
cut anybody. Hopefully animals won't dig it out, since it doesn't have any
attractive smell after the fire........
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: alex <al.m_at_3web.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Tin cans
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 18:45:32 -0800
> I think cans last years when buried, but I guess it depends on what they
are
> made of. I thought most were made of aluminum or steel, but not tin
> anymore?????

In food cans it must be steel (Ferrum), not tin (Stannum), of course.  They
look like covered with some other layer (to stop corrosion while they are in
use). My understanding is that this layer can be destroyed in fire,  so they
will eventually last shorter.  Anyway, I couldn't come with another
solution.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: RICHARD CULPEPER <culpeper_at_tbaytel.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Tin cans
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 22:07:25 -0500
When I was young and dumb (as opposed to middle-aged and mentally fatigued), I made the 
mistake of moving a canoe to the water while barefoot.  I sliced of a very large section of 
my heel on a burried can.  I still had over a week to go to the nearest nursing station.

I urge people to carry out their trash.  If they can bring it in, there is no reason, other 
than sloth, for them to not bring it out.

Richard Culpeper
http://my.tbaytel.net/culpeper/
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: ~Holmes <holmes375_at_yahoo.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Tin cans
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 19:38:27 -0800 (PST)
RICHARD CULPEPER <culpeper_at_tbaytel.net> wrote:
>I urge people to carry out their trash. If they can bring it in, there is no reason, other 
>than sloth, for them to not bring it out.

I agree wholeheartedly, however, I believe the poster was referring to trash left behind by others.  Dealing with other's refuse is problematic at best when on an extended trip.

Personally, I am usually able to avoid hauling canned items.  As most of us do, I re-package food stuffs, commercial versions as well as home dried.  I just detest the damned things!

Holmes
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: alex <al.m_at_3web.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Tin cans
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 20:08:52 -0800
> I agree wholeheartedly, however, I believe the poster was referring to
trash left behind by others.  Dealing with other's refuse is problematic at
best when on an extended trip.

Well, I meant both mine and others' refuse :-)... Anyway, the one that cut
Richard's heel, wasn't mine :-), I bury them above the high tide line.

> Personally, I am usually able to avoid hauling canned items.  As most of
us do, I re-package food stuffs, commercial versions as well as home dried.

Everything, but cans, can be repackaged for long trips. I couldn't find a
tasty and convenient way of using dried meat so far.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Dave Kruger <kdruger_at_pacifier.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Tin cans
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 20:32:47 -0800
Some folks I used to paddle with, on the coast of BC, would save their empty 
cans and take them, weighted with rocks, to a deep area and deep six them. 
The claim was that the cans would quickly rust in the salt water and become a 
nonproblem for any one.   I always wondered about the tuna cans, though.

--
Dave Kruger
Astoria, OR 
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: alex <al.m_at_3web.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Tin cans
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 21:54:42 -0800
> Some folks I used to paddle with, on the coast of BC, would save their
empty
> cans and take them, weighted with rocks, to a deep area and deep six them.
> The claim was that the cans would quickly rust in the salt water and
become a
> nonproblem for any one.   I always wondered about the tuna cans, though.

Good idea.  I would give it #2 place after taking it back to the launch site
;-)... Still, burning it before that would speed corrosion up, - my
rudimentary knowledge of chemistry tells me so. What's wrong with tuna
cans, - are they aluminum?
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Michael Daly <mikedaly_at_magma.ca>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Chief Seattle's words
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 01:20:36 -0500
On 9 Dec 2004 at 16:38, Steve Brown wrote:

> I think cans last years when buried, but I guess it depends on what
> they are made of. I thought most were made of aluminum or steel, but
> not tin anymore?????

They could be either aluminum or steel - tin is long gone.  Our kayak 
club cleans up Franklin Island campsites in Georgian Bay every 
September and we deal with a lot of cans.  The aluminum ones (beer 
and pop) will melt in the coals of a campfire but do not otherwise go 
away.  The steel cans definitely rust more quickly if they've been 
burned.  Since we clean every year, we can see the results of only 
one summer ("fresh" cans) or more (cans we obviously missed in 
previous years).  I'd much rather see them carried out and recycled 
than burned and left behind.  In Ontario provincial parks wilderness 
campsites, cans and bottles are banned - for a good reason.  If 
people were more responsible, the ban wouldn't be there and the rest 
of us wouldn't be inconvenienced.

Mike
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: <Rcgibbert_at_aol.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Chief Seattle's words
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 10:19:26 EST
In a message dated 12/9/2004 4:33:13 PM Pacific Standard Time, al.m_at_3web.net 
writes:


> I normally make a little bonfire before paddling off, burning
> everything that can be burned (like toilet paper), and throw in empty tin
> cans, then flatten them between two rocks, and bury in sand.  (Throwing in
> aslo a couple of somebody else's "items" from previous days and years). 

So let me comment please: You brought something into the wilderness and for 
whatever reason you decide to let items stay behind at your campsite? Why not 
just take a dedicated dry bag and bury them in your hatch after you've burned 
them?

Rob G
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: alex <al.m_at_3web.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Chief Seattle's words
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 11:06:25 -0800
> So let me comment please: You brought something into the wilderness and
for
> whatever reason you decide to let items stay behind at your campsite? Why
not
> just take a dedicated dry bag and bury them in your hatch after you've
burned
> them?

Agreed. I did so on the last couple of days (in a grocery bag, since didn't
have any spare drybag).  Just imagine the picture - fairly small foladble
kayak (a pain to load and unload); already trashed beach - mostly commercial
fishery and power boaters garbage, like broken beer bottles (can't
understand why people are doing this), motor oil canisters with remainders
of oil inside; ... and my 2 burned cans :-)....
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:40 PDT